Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing EVARREST™ fibrin sealant patch to standard of care in controlling bleeding following elective hepatectomy: anatomic versus non-anatomic resection.
Koea, Jonathan B; Batiller, Jonathan; Aguirre, Nicolas; Shen, Jessica; Kocharian, Richard; Bochicchio, Grant; Garden, O James.
Afiliação
  • Koea JB; The Department of Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: jonathan.koea@waitematadhb.govt.nz.
  • Batiller J; Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, United States.
  • Aguirre N; Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, United States.
  • Shen J; Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, United States.
  • Kocharian R; Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, United States.
  • Bochicchio G; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
  • Garden OJ; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
HPB (Oxford) ; 18(3): 221-8, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27017161
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This multicentre, randomized clinical trial assessed the safety and effectiveness of the EVARREST™ Fibrin Sealant Patch (FP) in treating parenchymal bleeding following anatomic and non-anatomic liver resections.

METHODS:

One hundred and two patients were stratified according to the type of hepatic resection (anatomic/non-anatomic), and randomized (11) after identification of an appropriate bleeding site, to FP vs Standard of Care (SoC, manual compression ± topical haemostat). The primary endpoint was haemostasis at 4 min from bleeding site identification with no re-bleeding requiring re-treatment.

RESULTS:

The FP was superior in achieving haemostasis at 4 min (96%, 48/50) to SoC (46%, 24/52; p < 0.001). Stratification for resection type showed treatment differences for primary endpoint for anatomic (24/25 FP vs 13/23 SoC; p = 0.001) and non-anatomic liver resections (24/25FP vs 11/29 SoC; p < 0.001). Adverse events related to the study procedure were reported in 40/50 patients (80%) in the FP group and 43/52 patients (83%) in the SoC group. One (2%) adverse event (infected intra-abdominal fluid collection) was possibly related to study treatment.

CONCLUSION:

This clinical trial confirms that the FP is safe and highly effective in controlling parenchymal bleeding following hepatectomy regardless of the type of resection. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01993888.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adesivos Teciduais / Hemostáticos / Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina / Técnicas Hemostáticas / Hemorragia Pós-Operatória / Hepatectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa / Oceania Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adesivos Teciduais / Hemostáticos / Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina / Técnicas Hemostáticas / Hemorragia Pós-Operatória / Hepatectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa / Oceania Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
...