Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cochlear function tests in estimation of speech dynamic range.
Han, Jung Ju; Park, So Young; Park, Shi Nae; Na, Mi Sun; Lee, Philip; Han, Jae Sang.
Afiliação
  • Han JJ; a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine , The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Korea.
  • Park SY; a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine , The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Korea.
  • Park SN; a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine , The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Korea.
  • Na MS; a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine , The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Korea.
  • Lee P; a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine , The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Korea.
  • Han JS; a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine , The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Korea.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 136(10): 1041-5, 2016 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27109439
OBJECTIVES: The loss of active cochlear mechanics causes elevated thresholds, loudness recruitment, and reduced frequency selectivity. The problems faced by hearing-impaired listeners are largely related with reduced dynamic range (DR). The aim of this study was to determine which index of the cochlear function tests correlates best with the DR to speech stimuli. METHODS: Audiological data on 516 ears with pure tone average (PTA) of ≤55 dB and word recognition score of ≥70% were analyzed. PTA, speech recognition threshold (SRT), uncomfortable loudness (UCL), and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) were explored as the indices of cochlear function. Audiometric configurations were classified. Correlation between each index and the DR was assessed and multiple regression analysis was done. RESULTS: PTA and SRT demonstrated strong negative correlations with the DR (r = -0.788 and -0.860, respectively), while DPOAE sum was moderately correlated (r = 0.587). UCLs remained quite constant for the total range of the DR. The regression equation was Y (DR) = 75.238 - 0.719 × SRT (R(2 )=( )0.721, p < 0.001). The other variables such as audiometric configurations and DPOAE sum were excluded from the final model. CONCLUSION: SRT was the most predictive of the DR among the indices of the cochlear function tests. A reduced DR in cochlear hearing loss was the product of an elevated audiometric threshold and a relatively constant UCL level. The results enable prediction of the DR from SRT and possibly PTA using the suggested regression equation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Limiar Auditivo / Percepção da Fala / Cóclea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Otolaryngol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Limiar Auditivo / Percepção da Fala / Cóclea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Otolaryngol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido