Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preliminary comparison of primary and conversion surgery with magnetically controlled growing rods in children with early onset scoliosis.
Keskinen, Heli; Helenius, Ilkka; Nnadi, Colin; Cheung, Kenneth; Ferguson, J; Mundis, Gregory; Pawelek, Jeff; Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
Afiliação
  • Keskinen H; Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland.
  • Helenius I; Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland. ilkka.helenius@utu.fi.
  • Nnadi C; Spine Unit, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Cheung K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
  • Ferguson J; Starship Children's Hospital, 2 Park Rod, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Mundis G; San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Pawelek J; San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Akbarnia BA; San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Eur Spine J ; 25(10): 3294-3300, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27160822
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Non-invasive distraction of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) avoids repeated surgical lengthening in patients with early onset scoliosis, but it is not known how effective this technique is in previously operated children.

METHODS:

In a retrospective, multicentre study, the data were obtained for 27 primary (P) patients [mean age 7.0 (2.4-10.7) years at surgery] and 23 conversion (C) patients [mean age 7.7 (3.6-11.0) years at conversion from standard growing rods] with 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS:

The mean major curve was 63.9° in the P group and 46.5° in the C group at baseline (preoperatively, p = 0.0009) and 39.5° and 39.6°, respectively, at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.99). The mean percentage change of spinal growth from baseline to 1-year follow-up was 18.3 % in the P group and 6.5 % in the C group (p = 0.007). Comparing the spinal growth from postoperative to 1-year follow-up no statistical difference was observed between the study groups (1.8 % P vs -2.2 % C, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS:

Scoliosis can be equally controlled after conversion from traditional growing rods into MCGR, but spinal growth from baseline is less in the conversion patients as compared with the primary group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escoliose / Osteogênese por Distração / Imãs Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia País de publicação: ALEMANHA / ALEMANIA / DE / DEUSTCHLAND / GERMANY
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escoliose / Osteogênese por Distração / Imãs Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia País de publicação: ALEMANHA / ALEMANIA / DE / DEUSTCHLAND / GERMANY