Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Bedke, Jens; Gauler, Thomas; Grünwald, Viktor; Hegele, Axel; Herrmann, Edwin; Hinz, Stefan; Janssen, Jan; Schmitz, Stephan; Schostak, Martin; Tesch, Hans; Zastrow, Stefan; Miller, Kurt.
Afiliação
  • Bedke J; Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. bedke@live.com.
  • Gauler T; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Grünwald V; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Hegele A; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Herrmann E; Department of Urology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Hinz S; Department of Urology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Janssen J; Onkologie Westerstede, Westerstede, Germany.
  • Schmitz S; Gemeinschaftspraxis für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Köln, Germany.
  • Schostak M; Department of Urology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Tesch H; Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Zastrow S; Department of Urology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Miller K; Department of Urology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
World J Urol ; 35(2): 179-188, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27277600
PURPOSE: Current systemic treatment of targeted therapies, namely the vascular endothelial growth factor-antibody (VEGF-AB), VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, have improved progression-free survival and replaced non-specific immunotherapy with cytokines in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: A panel of experts convened to review currently available phase 3 data for mRCC treatment of approved agents, in addition to available EAU guideline data for a collaborative review as the plurality of substances offers different options of first-, second- and third-line treatment with potential sequencing. RESULTS: Sunitinib and pazopanib are approved treatments in first-line therapy for patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Temsirolimus has proven benefit over interferon-alfa (IFN-α) in patients with non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). In the second-line treatment TKIs or mTOR inhibitors are treatment choices. Therapy options after TKI failure consist of everolimus and axitinib. Available third-line options consist of everolimus and sorafenib. Recently, nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD1) checkpoint inhibitor, improved overall survival benefit compared to everolimus after failure of one or two VEGFR-targeted therapies, which is likely to become the first established checkpoint inhibitor in mRCC. Data for the sequencing of agents remain limited. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high level of evidence for first and second-line treatment in mRCC, data for third-line therapy are limited. Possible sequences include TKI-mTOR-TKI or TKI-TKI-mTOR with the upcoming checkpoint inhibitors in perspective, which might settle a new standard of care after previous TKI therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renais / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renais / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Alemanha