Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cross-calibration of the Siemens mMR: easily acquired accurate PET phantom measurements, long-term stability and reproducibility.
Keller, Sune H; Jakoby, Björn; Svalling, Susanne; Kjaer, Andreas; Højgaard, Liselotte; Klausen, Thomas L.
Afiliação
  • Keller SH; 3982 Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet (University of Copenhagen), Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. sune@pet.rh.dk.
  • Jakoby B; Diagnostic Imaging, Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee am Roethelheimpark 2, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Svalling S; University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Kjaer A; 3982 Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet (University of Copenhagen), Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Højgaard L; 3982 Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet (University of Copenhagen), Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Klausen TL; 3982 Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet (University of Copenhagen), Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
EJNMMI Phys ; 3(1): 11, 2016 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27387738
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We present a quick and easy method to perform quantitatively accurate PET scans of typical water-filled PET plastic shell phantoms on the Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR system. We perform regular cross-calibrations (Xcal) of our PET systems, including the PET/MR, using a Siemens mCT water phantom. LONG-TERM STABILITY The mMR calibration stability was evaluated over a 3-year period where 54 cross-calibrations were acquired, showing that the mMR on average underestimated the concentration by 16 %, consistently due to the use of MR-based µ-maps. The mMR produced the narrowest calibration ratio range with the lowest standard deviation, implying it is the most stable of the six systems in the study over a 3-year period. MMR ACCURACY WITH PREDEFINED µ-MAPS With the latest mMR software version, VB20P, it is possible to utilize predefined phantom µ-maps. We evaluated both the system-integrated, predefined µ-map of the long mMR water phantom and our own user-defined CT-based µ-map of the mCT water phantom, which is used for cross-calibration. For seven scans, which were reconstructed with correctly segmented µ-maps, the mMR produced cross-calibration ratios of 1.00-1.02, well within the acceptance range [0.95-1.05], showing high accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS:

The mMR is the most stable PET system in this study, and the mean underestimation is no longer an issue with the easily accessible µ-map, which resulted in correct cross-calibration ratios in all seven tests. We will share the user-defined µ-map of the mCT phantom and the protocol with interested mMR users.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: EJNMMI Phys Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca País de publicação: ALEMANHA / ALEMANIA / DE / DEUSTCHLAND / GERMANY

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: EJNMMI Phys Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca País de publicação: ALEMANHA / ALEMANIA / DE / DEUSTCHLAND / GERMANY