Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Engaging migrants and other stakeholders to improve communication in cross-cultural consultation in primary care: a theoretically informed participatory study.
Lionis, Christos; Papadakaki, Maria; Saridaki, Aristoula; Dowrick, Christopher; O'Donnell, Catherine A; Mair, Frances S; van den Muijsenbergh, Maria; Burns, Nicola; de Brún, Tomas; O'Reilly de Brún, Mary; van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn; Spiegel, Wolfgang; MacFarlane, Anne.
Afiliação
  • Lionis C; Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
  • Papadakaki M; Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece Department of Social Work, School of Health and Social Welfare, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
  • Saridaki A; Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
  • Dowrick C; Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • O'Donnell CA; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow.
  • Mair FS; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow.
  • van den Muijsenbergh M; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Pharos Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Burns N; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster Medical School, Furness College, University of Lancaster, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
  • de Brún T; Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • O'Reilly de Brún M; Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • van Weel-Baumgarten E; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Spiegel W; Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • MacFarlane A; Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
BMJ Open ; 6(7): e010822, 2016 07 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27449890
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Guidelines and training initiatives (G/TIs) are available to support communication in cross-cultural consultations but are rarely implemented in routine practice in primary care. As part of the European Union RESTORE project, our objective was to explore whether the available G/TIs make sense to migrants and other key stakeholders and whether they could collectively choose G/TIs and engage in their implementation in primary care settings.

SETTING:

As part of a comparative analysis of 5 linked qualitative case studies, we used purposeful and snowball sampling to recruit migrants and other key stakeholders in primary care settings in Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 78 stakeholders participated in the study (Austria 15, England 9, Ireland 11, Greece 16, Netherlands 27), covering a range of groups (migrants, general practitioners, nurses, administrative staff, interpreters, health service planners). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

We combined Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) research to conduct a series of PLA style focus groups. Using a standardised protocol, stakeholders' discussions about a set of G/TIs were recorded on PLA commentary charts and their selection process was recorded through a PLA direct-ranking technique. We performed inductive and deductive thematic analysis to investigate sensemaking and engagement with the G/TIs.

RESULTS:

The need for new ways of working was strongly endorsed by most stakeholders. Stakeholders considered that they were the right people to drive the work forward and were keen to enrol others to support the implementation work. This was evidenced by the democratic selection by stakeholders in each setting of one G/TI as a local implementation project.

CONCLUSIONS:

This theoretically informed participatory approach used across 5 countries with diverse healthcare systems could be used in other settings to establish positive conditions for the start of implementation journeys for G/TIs to improve healthcare for migrants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Migrantes / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Comunicação / Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Equity_inequality Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Migrantes / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Comunicação / Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Equity_inequality Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM