Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of regional versus local anaesthesia on outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation: a randomised controlled trial.
Aitken, Emma; Jackson, Andrew; Kearns, Rachel; Steven, Mark; Kinsella, John; Clancy, Marc; Macfarlane, Alan.
Afiliação
  • Aitken E; Department of Renal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: emmaaitken@nhs.net.
  • Jackson A; Department of Renal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Kearns R; Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Steven M; Department of Anaesthesia, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
  • Kinsella J; Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Clancy M; Department of Renal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Macfarlane A; Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lancet ; 388(10049): 1067-1074, 2016 Sep 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492881
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Arteriovenous fistulae are the optimum form of vascular access in end-stage renal failure. However, they have a high early failure rate. Regional compared with local anaesthesia results in greater vasodilatation and increases short-term blood flow. This study investigated whether regional compared with local anaesthesia improved medium-term arteriovenous fistula patency.

METHODS:

This observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial was done at three university hospitals in Glasgow, UK. Adults undergoing primary radiocephalic or brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation were randomly assigned (11; in blocks of eight) using a computer-generated allocation system to receive either local anaesthesia (0·5% L-bupivacaine and 1% lidocaine injected subcutaneously) or regional (brachial plexus block [BPB]) anaesthesia (0·5% L-bupivacaine and 1·5% lidocaine with epinephrine). Patients were excluded if they were coagulopathic, had no suitable vessels, or had a previous failed ipsilateral fistula. The primary endpoint was arteriovenous fistula patency at 3 months. We analysed the data on an intention-to-treat basis. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01706354) and is complete.

FINDINGS:

Between Feb 6, 2013, and Dec 4, 2015, 163 patients were assessed for eligibility and 126 patients were randomly assigned to local anaesthesia (n=63) or BPB (n=63). All patients completed follow-up on an intention-to-treat basis. Primary patency at 3 months was higher in the BPB group than the local anaesthesia group (53 [84%] of 63 patients vs 39 [62%] of 63; odds ratio [OR] 3·3 [95% CI 1·4-7·6], p=0·005) and was greater in radiocephalic fistulae (20 [77%] of 26 patients vs 12 [48%] of 25; OR 3·6 [1·4-3·6], p=0·03). There were no significant adverse events related to the procedure.

INTERPRETATION:

Compared with local anaesthesia, BPB significantly improved 3 month primary patency rates for arteriovenous fistulae.

FUNDING:

Regional Anaesthesia UK, Darlinda's Charity for Renal Research.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diálise Renal / Anestesia Local Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diálise Renal / Anestesia Local Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article