Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[PROGNOSTIC MODELS IN MODERN MANAGEMENT OF VULVAR CANCER].
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) ; 55(1): 17-26, 2016.
Article em Bg | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27514127
AIM: The aim of the research was to evaluate and analyse prognosis and prognostic factors in patients with squamous cell vulvar carcinoma after primary surgery with individual approach applied during the course of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period between January 2000 and July 2010, 113 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were diagnosed and operated on at Gynecologic Oncology Clinic of Medical University, Pleven. All the patients were monitored at the same clinic. Individual approach was applied to each patient and whenever it was possible, more conservative operative techniques were applied. The probable clinicopathological characteristics influencing the overall survival and recurrence free survival were analyzed. Univariate statistical analysis and Cox regression analysis were made in order to evaluate the characteristics, which were statistically significant for overall survival and survival without recurrence. A multivariate logistic regression analysis (Forward Wald procedure) was applied to evaluate the combined influence of the significant factors. While performing the multivariate analysis, the synergic effect of the independent prognostic factors of both kinds of survivals was also evaluated. RESULTS: Approaching individually each patient, we applied the following operative techniques: 1. Deep total radical vulvectomy with separate incisions for lymph dissection (LD) or without dissection--68 (60.18 %) patients. 2. En-bloc vulvectomy with bilateral LD without vulva reconstruction--10 (8.85%) 3. Modified radical vulvactomy (hemivulvectomy, patial vulvactomy)--25 (22.02%). 4. wide-local excision--3 (2.65%). 5. Simple (total /partial) vulvectomy--5 (4.43%) patients. 6. En-bloc resection with reconstruction--2 (1.77%) After a thorough analysis of the overall survival and recurrence free survival, we made the conclusion that the relapse occurrence and clinical stage of FIGO were independent prognostic factors for overall survival and the independent prognostic factors for recurrence free survival were: metastatic inguinal nodes (unilateral or bilateral), tumor size (above or below 3 cm) and lymphovascular space invasion. On the basis of these results we created two prognostic models: 1. A prognostic model of overall survival 2. A prognostic model for survival without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Following the surgical staging of the disease, were able to gather and analyse important clinicopathological indexes, which gave us the opportunity to form prognostic groups for overall survival and recurrence-free survival.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vulva / Neoplasias Vulvares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: Bg Revista: Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Bulgária
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vulva / Neoplasias Vulvares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: Bg Revista: Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Bulgária