Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antistaphylococcal ß-Lactams versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Susceptible Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: a Prospective Cohort Study from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis.
Carugati, M; Petti, C A; Arnold, C; Miro, J M; Pericàs, J M; Garcia de la Maria, C; Kanafani, Z; Durante-Mangoni, E; Baddley, J; Wray, D; Klein, J L; Delahaye, F; Fernandez-Hidalgo, N; Hannan, M M; Murdoch, D; Bayer, A; Chu, V H.
Afiliação
  • Carugati M; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA manuela.carugati@duke.edu.
  • Petti CA; Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Arnold C; Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • Miro JM; Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pericàs JM; Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Garcia de la Maria C; Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Kanafani Z; Division of Infectious Diseases, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Durante-Mangoni E; University of Naples SUN, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  • Baddley J; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Wray D; Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Klein JL; Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Delahaye F; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Equipe d'Accueil HESPER 7425, Lyon, France.
  • Fernandez-Hidalgo N; Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Hannan MM; Department of Microbiology, Mater Misericordiae University and Mater Private-Hospitals, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Murdoch D; University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Bayer A; LA Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA, and Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Chu VH; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(10): 6341-9, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27527083
ABSTRACT
The phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is heterogeneous regardless of the presence of the mecA gene. The potential discordance between phenotypic and genotypic results has led to the use of vancomycin for the treatment of CoNS infective endocarditis (IE) regardless of methicillin MIC values. In this study, we assessed the outcome of methicillin-susceptible CoNS IE among patients treated with antistaphylococcal ß-lactams (ASB) versus vancomycin (VAN) in a multicenter cohort study based on data from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE) Prospective Cohort Study (PCS) and the ICE-Plus databases. The ICE-PCS database contains prospective data on 5,568 patients with IE collected between 2000 and 2006, while the ICE-Plus database contains prospective data on 2,019 patients with IE collected between 2008 and 2012. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were 6-month mortality and survival time. Of the 7,587 patients in the two databases, there were 280 patients with methicillin-susceptible CoNS IE. Detailed treatment and outcome data were available for 180 patients. Eighty-eight patients received ASB, while 36 were treated with VAN. In-hospital mortality (19.3% versus 11.1%; P = 0.27), 6-month mortality (31.6% versus 25.9%; P = 0.58), and survival time after discharge (P = 0.26) did not significantly differ between the two cohorts. Cox regression analysis did not show any significant association between ASB use and the survival time (hazard ratio, 1.7; P = 0.22); this result was not affected by adjustment for confounders. This study provides no evidence for a difference in outcome with the use of VAN versus ASB for methicillin-susceptible CoNS IE.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus / Vancomicina / Beta-Lactamas / Endocardite Bacteriana Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus / Vancomicina / Beta-Lactamas / Endocardite Bacteriana Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos