Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature.
Saltzman, B M; Erickson, B J; Frank, J M; Harris, J D; Nicholson, G P; Bach, B R; Verma, N N; Romeo, A A.
Afiliação
  • Saltzman BM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. bryan.m.saltzman@gmail.com.
  • Erickson BJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
  • Frank JM; Division of Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, 181 W Meadow Dr., Vail, CO, 81657, USA.
  • Harris JD; Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin, Smith Tower, Suite 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Nicholson GP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
  • Bach BR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
  • Verma NN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
  • Romeo AA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 100(3): 157-163, 2016 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27628911
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose was to perform a systematic review of the literature investigating biomechanical studies of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) techniques to summarize the most commonly analyzed methods of fixation (at both the ulna and humerus), the degree of elbow flexion at the time of fixation, graft characteristics, and modes of failure with these techniques. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review was performed. All cadaveric biomechanical studies that tested a reconstruction method for UCLR were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each study and parameter/variable analyzed.

RESULTS:

Twenty-three studies were included with a total of 397 elbows in 242 cadavers (mean age 54.8 ± 20 years, range 16-96). The majority of studies (65 %) used a palmaris longus graft. The docking technique (37.2 %) was the most commonly tested reconstruction method. Significant heterogeneity between studies precluded assimilation of specific techniques (each of the 23 studies utilized a unique technique). Fixation was performed at 30°-90° of elbow flexion. The most common mode of failure was suture failure (51 %), followed by midsubstance rupture (27.00 %), and bone tunnel fracture (14.00 %). No significant differences were observed amongst techniques for all measures analyzed.

CONCLUSION:

This study found the docking technique to be the most commonly tested technique, while the mode of reconstruction failure was most commonly at the suture interface. If the graft failed at the bone interface, it was most likely to occur at the ulna. Surgeon preference and comfort level with a specific technique should dictate choice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenômenos Biomecânicos / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Ligamento Colateral Ulnar Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Musculoskelet Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenômenos Biomecânicos / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Ligamento Colateral Ulnar Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Musculoskelet Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...