Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can the Functional Movement Screen™ be used to capture changes in spine and knee motion control following 12 weeks of training?
Frost, David M; Beach, Tyson A C; Campbell, Troy L; Callaghan, Jack P; McGill, Stuart M.
Afiliação
  • Frost DM; Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2W6, Canada. Electronic address: d.frost@utoronto.ca.
  • Beach TA; Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2W6, Canada. Electronic address: tyson.beach@utoronto.ca.
  • Campbell TL; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
  • Callaghan JP; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. Electronic address: callagha@uwaterloo.ca.
  • McGill SM; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. Electronic address: mcgill@uwaterloo.ca.
Phys Ther Sport ; 23: 50-57, 2017 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27693921
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether objective measures of spine and frontal plane knee motion exhibited during Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS) task performance changed following a movement-guided fitness (MOV) and conventional fitness (FIT) exercise intervention. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled experiment. Before and after 12 weeks of exercise, participants' kinematics were quantified while performing the FMS and a series of general whole-body movement tasks. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two firefighters were assigned to MOV, FIT, or a control (CON) group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak lumbar spine flexion/extension, lateral bend and axial twist, and frontal plane knee motion. RESULTS: The post-training kinematic changes exhibited by trainees while performing the FMS tasks were similar in magnitude (effect size < 0.8) to those exhibited by CON. However, when performing the battery of general whole-body movement tasks, only MOV showed significant improvements in spine and frontal plane knee motion control (effect size > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Whether graded qualitatively, or quantitatively via kinematic analyses, the FMS may not be a viable tool to detect movement-based exercise adaptations. Amendments to the FMS tasks and/or scoring method are needed before it can be used for reasons beyond appraising the ability to move freely, symmetrically, and without pain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Exercício Físico / Aptidão Física / Teste de Esforço / Traumatismos Ocupacionais / Articulação do Joelho / Movimento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Phys Ther Sport Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / MEDICINA FISICA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Exercício Físico / Aptidão Física / Teste de Esforço / Traumatismos Ocupacionais / Articulação do Joelho / Movimento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Phys Ther Sport Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / MEDICINA FISICA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido