Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
1-year follow-up of neurofeedback treatment in adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: randomised controlled trial.
Bink, Marleen; Bongers, Ilja L; Popma, Arne; Janssen, Tieme W P; van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs.
Afiliação
  • Bink M; , PhD, Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Scientific Center for Care & Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Bongers IL; , PhD, GGzECenter for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Eindhoven; Scientific Center for Care & Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Popma A; , MD, PhD, Academic Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, VUmc/De Bascule, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Janssen TW; , MSc, Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Nieuwenhuizen C; , PhD, Scientific Center for Care & Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg; GGzECenter for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
BJPsych Open ; 2(2): 107-115, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27703763
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Estimates of the effectiveness of neurofeedback as a treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are mixed.

AIMS:

To investigate the long-term additional effects of neurofeedback (NFB) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents with ADHD.

METHOD:

Using a multicentre parallel-randomised controlled trial design, 60 adolescents with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD receiving NFB+TAU (n=41) or TAU (n=19) were followed up. Neurofeedback treatment consisted of approximately 37 sessions of theta/sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)-training on the vertex (Cz). Outcome measures included behavioural self-reports and neurocognitive measures. Allocation to the conditions was unmasked.

RESULTS:

At 1-year follow-up, inattention as reported by adolescents was decreased (range ηp2=0.23-0.36, P<0.01) and performance on neurocognitive tasks was faster (range ηp2=0.20-0.67, P<0.005) irrespective of treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, NFB+TAU was as effective as TAU. Given the absence of robust additional effects of neurofeedback in the current study, results do not support the use of theta/SMR neurofeedback as a treatment for adolescents with ADHD and comorbid disorders in clinical practice. DECLARATION OF INTEREST None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda