Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinicians' perspective of the current diagnostic criteria for myofascial pain syndrome.
Grosman-Rimon, Liza; Clarke, Hance; Chan, Aaron K; Mills, Patricia Branco; Rathbone, Alasdair Timothy Llewelyn; Kumbhare, Dinesh.
Afiliação
  • Grosman-Rimon L; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Clarke H; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Chan AK; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Mills PB; Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Rathbone ATL; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Kumbhare D; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 30(3): 509-514, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27858678
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. However, MPS is often under-diagnosed. The purpose of this study was to characterize practicing clinicians' perspectives of the current diagnostic criteria for MPS.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study design was used with a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluated clinicians' perspective of the current diagnostic criteria for MPS. The sample population (n= 119) consisted of 40% family physicians, 31% physical medicine (PM) and rehabilitation specialists, 11% rheumatologists, 10% emergency room (ER) physicians, and 8% anesthesiologists specializing in chronic pain.

RESULTS:

Our findings demonstrated that participating clinicians agree that ``point tenderness'' and ``pain reproduction'' are criteria for MPS. In contrast, the clinicians do not consider ``autonomic symptoms'' as an important criterion for MPS. The anesthesiologists view ``restricted range of motion'' as a criterion for MPS more than the other groups, and they tend to consider ``referred pain'' and ``pain reproduction'' as criteria. Physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists and anesthesiologists tend to view ``local twitch response'' more as a criterion for MPS compared with the other groups. Most groups of clinicians consider ``weakness without atrophy'' as an important MPS criterion except for family physicians. It is important to note that ``poor sleep'', ``daytime fatigue'' and ``cognitive symptoms'', which are not considered as MPS symptoms, are often mistaken for MPS among practicing clinicians.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that the diagnostic criteria are not well known, highlighting the need for an expert consensus to determine the importance of each criterion for MPS diagnosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes da Dor Miofascial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes da Dor Miofascial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá