Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of the Hypnotic Agent on Primary Graft Dysfunction After Liver Transplantation.
Gajate Martín, L; González, C; Ruiz Torres, I; Fernández Martín, C; Martín Grande, A; Elías Martín, E; Parise Roux, D; Del Rey Sánchez, J M.
Afiliação
  • Gajate Martín L; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: gajate.luis@gmail.com.
  • González C; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ruiz Torres I; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernández Martín C; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martín Grande A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Elías Martín E; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Parise Roux D; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Del Rey Sánchez JM; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Transplant Proc ; 48(10): 3307-3311, 2016 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27931574
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Morbidity and mortality rates in orthotopic liver transplantation have decreased in the past few years. Risk factors related to severe postoperative complications, such as primary graft dysfunction, still need to be analyzed. We evaluated the influence of the hypnotic agent used during anesthesia on primary graft dysfunction.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 419 consecutive patients who received a liver transplant between 2005 and 2013 in a single center. We analyzed the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (defined as alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase levels higher than 1500 IU/L on the first 3 days after surgery) and if the hypnotic agent was associated with this event.

RESULTS:

The incidence of primary graft dysfunction was 42.2% (114 patients), similar in both groups (propofol group, 89 patients, 43.2% and sevoflurane group, 25 patients, 39.1%). In the multivariate analysis, we did not find any relationship between the hypnotic agent (propofol or sevoflurane) and early graft dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our patients, we found no differences in the incidence of liver graft dysfunction according to the hypnotic used during transplantation. We can suggest that both drugs (sevoflurane and propofol) are equally safe in orthotopic liver transplantation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Transplante de Fígado / Disfunção Primária do Enxerto / Hipnóticos e Sedativos / Anestesia / Éteres Metílicos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Transplante de Fígado / Disfunção Primária do Enxerto / Hipnóticos e Sedativos / Anestesia / Éteres Metílicos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article