Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Access to Accredited Cancer Hospitals Within Federal Exchange Plans Under the Affordable Care Act.
Kehl, Kenneth L; Liao, Kai-Ping; Krause, Trudy M; Giordano, Sharon H.
Afiliação
  • Kehl KL; Kenneth L. Kehl, Kai-Ping Liao, and Sharon H. Giordano, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Trudy M. Krause, University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX.
  • Liao KP; Kenneth L. Kehl, Kai-Ping Liao, and Sharon H. Giordano, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Trudy M. Krause, University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX.
  • Krause TM; Kenneth L. Kehl, Kai-Ping Liao, and Sharon H. Giordano, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Trudy M. Krause, University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX.
  • Giordano SH; Kenneth L. Kehl, Kai-Ping Liao, and Sharon H. Giordano, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Trudy M. Krause, University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(6): 645-651, 2017 Feb 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068172
Purpose The Affordable Care Act expanded access to health insurance in the United States, but concerns have arisen about access to specialized cancer care within narrow provider networks. To characterize the scope and potential impact of this problem, we assessed rates of inclusion of Commission on Cancer (CoC) -accredited hospitals and National Cancer Institute (NCI) -designated cancer centers within federal exchange networks. Methods We downloaded publicly available machine-readable network data and public use files for individual federal exchange plans from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the 2016 enrollment year. We linked this information to National Provider Identifier data, identified a set of distinct provider networks, and assessed the rates of inclusion of CoC-accredited hospitals and NCI-designated centers. We measured variation in these rates according to geography, plan type, and metal level. Results Of 4,058 unique individual plans, network data were available for 3,637 (90%); hospital information was available for 3,531 (87%). Provider lists for these plans reduced into 295 unique networks for analysis. Ninety-five percent of networks included at least one CoC-accredited hospital, but just 41% of networks included NCI-designated centers. States and counties each varied substantially in the proportion of networks listed that included NCI-designated centers (range, 0% to 100%). The proportion of networks that included NCI-designated centers also varied by plan type (range, 31% for health maintenance organizations to 49% for preferred provider organizations; P = .04) but not by metal level. Conclusion A large majority of federal exchange networks contain CoC-accredited hospitals, but most do not contain NCI-designated cancer centers. These results will inform policy regarding access to cancer care, and they reinforce the importance of promoting access to clinical trials and specialized care through community sites.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Institutos de Câncer / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Institutos de Câncer / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos