Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.
Eapen, Renu S; Herlemann, Annika; Washington, Samuel L; Cooperberg, Matthew R.
Afiliação
  • Eapen RS; aDepartment of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA bDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany cDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Curr Opin Urol ; 27(3): 205-209, 2017 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28221220
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a grade 'D' recommendation against the use of routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for any men. This recommendation reflects critical misinterpretations of the available evidence base regarding benefits and harms of PSA screening and has influenced the nationwide landscape of prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. RECENT

FINDINGS:

Following the USPSTF recommendation, a substantial decline in PSA screening was noted for all age groups. Similarly, overall rates of prostate biopsy and prostate cancer incidence have significantly decreased with a shift toward higher grade and stage disease upon diagnosis. Concurrently, the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer has significantly risen in the United States. These trends are concerning particularly for the younger men with occult high-grade disease who are expected to benefit the most from early detection and definitive prostate cancer treatment.

SUMMARY:

These emerging trends in PSA screening and prostate cancer incidence following the USPSTF recommendation may have significant public health implications. Due to the long natural history of the disease, a long-term follow-up is needed to provide a better understanding on the implications of such recommendations on disease progression and mortality rates in prostate cancer patients. The future of US screening policy should reflect a targeted 'smarter' screening strategy rather than dichotomizing the decision between 'screen all' or 'screen none'.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Programas de Rastreamento / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Comitês Consultivos / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Curr Opin Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Programas de Rastreamento / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Comitês Consultivos / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Curr Opin Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos