Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the use of Routine Outcome Monitoring in the treatment of patients with a psychotic disorder.
Tasma, M; Liemburg, E J; Knegtering, H; Delespaul, P A E G; Boonstra, A; Castelein, S.
Afiliação
  • Tasma M; Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Rob Giel Research Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.tasma@lentis.nl.
  • Liemburg EJ; Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Rob Giel Research Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Knegtering H; Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Rob Giel Research Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Delespaul PAEG; Maastricht University, Faculty of Psychiatry & Psychology, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Mondriaan Mental Health Trust, Heerlen-Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Boonstra A; University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Castelein S; Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Rob Giel Research Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur Psychiatry ; 42: 89-94, 2017 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314165
BACKGROUND: Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) has become part of the treatment process in mental health care. However, studies have indicated that few clinicians in psychiatry use the outcome of ROM in their daily work. The aim of this study was to explore the degree of ROM use in clinical practice as well as the explanatory factors of this use. METHODS: In the Northern Netherlands, a ROM-protocol (ROM-Phamous) for patients with a psychotic disorder has been implemented. To establish the degree of ROM-Phamous use in clinical practice, the ROM results of patients (n=204) were compared to the treatment goals formulated in their treatment plans. To investigate factors that might influence ROM use, clinicians (n=32) were asked to fill out a questionnaire about ROM-Phamous. RESULTS: Care domains that were problematic according to the ROM-Phamous results were mentioned in the treatment plan in 28% of cases on average (range 5-45%). The use of ROM-Phamous in the treatment process varies considerably among clinicians. Most of the clinicians find ROM-Phamous both useful and important for good clinical practice. In contrast, the perceived ease-of-use is low and most clinicians report insufficient time to use ROM-Phamous. CONCLUSIONS: More frequent ROM use should be facilitated in clinicians. This could be achieved by improving the fit with clinical routines and the ease-of-use of ROM systems. It is important for all stakeholders to invest in integrating ROM in clinical practice. Eventually, this might improve the diagnostics and treatment of patients in mental health care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente / Transtornos Psicóticos / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Psychiatry Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente / Transtornos Psicóticos / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Psychiatry Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido