[Comparison of refraction with or without cycloplegia using Retinomax® or Plusoptix® devices]. / Comparaison de la réfraction avec ou sans cycloplégie au Retinomax® vs Plusoptix®.
J Fr Ophtalmol
; 40(3): 209-214, 2017 Mar.
Article
em Fr
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-28318725
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the refraction in children measured with Plusoptix® without cycloplegia vs. Retinomax® apparatus with cycloplegia. PATIENTS ANDMETHODS:
Measure of refraction with Plusoptix® in children>1year old referred for systematic vision screening, then measurement after cycloplegia with cyclopentolate by the Retinomax® device.RESULTS:
Thirty-three children were included, i.e. 66eyes. Mean age was 40.7months (minimum 12; maximum 114). The Spearman correlation coefficient for the spherical equivalent was 0.52 (Plusoptix® vs. Retinomax® comparison; P<0.0001=moderate correlation). The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.73 for astigmatism (Plusoptix® vs. Retinomax® comparison; P<0.0001=strong correlation). The Plusoptix® sensitivity for measurement of refraction was 57%, 43% and 43% respectively for spherical equivalent, sphere and astigmatism. DISCUSSION ANDCONCLUSION:
The correlation of astigmatism values is strong, whereas the correlation of sphere values is moderate. Plusoptix® seems to be unable to measure the exact refraction, because there is too large a dispersion of refraction measurements with Plusoptix®, compared to the exact refraction measured with the Retinomax®. Moreover, the sensitivity of Plusoptix® is low. Cycloplegic refraction remains indispensable in children.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Refração Ocular
/
Erros de Refração
/
Seleção Visual
/
Distúrbios Pupilares
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Evaluation_studies
Limite:
Child
/
Child, preschool
/
Humans
/
Infant
Idioma:
Fr
Revista:
J Fr Ophtalmol
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Article