Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vivo response to decellularized mesothelium scaffolds.
Cronce, Michael J; Faulknor, Renea A; Pomerantseva, Irina; Liu, Xiang-Hong; Goldman, Scott M; Ekwueme, Emmanuel C; Mwizerwa, Olive; Neville, Craig M; Sundback, Cathryn A.
Afiliação
  • Cronce MJ; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114.
  • Faulknor RA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114.
  • Pomerantseva I; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115.
  • Liu XH; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114.
  • Goldman SM; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114.
  • Ekwueme EC; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115.
  • Mwizerwa O; DSM Biomedical, Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341.
  • Neville CM; DSM Biomedical, Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341.
  • Sundback CA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 106(2): 716-725, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28323397
ABSTRACT
Biological surgical scaffolds are used in plastic and reconstructive surgery to support structural reinforcement and regeneration of soft tissue defects. Macrophage and fibroblast cell populations heavily regulate scaffold integration into host tissue following implantation. In the present study, the biological host response to a commercially available surgical scaffold (Meso BioMatrix Surgical Mesh (MBM)) was investigated for up to 9 weeks after subcutaneous implantation; this scaffold promoted superior cell migration and infiltration previously in in vitro studies relative to other commercially available scaffolds. Infiltrating macrophages and fibroblasts phenotypes were assessed for evidence of inflammation and remodeling. At week 1, macrophages were the dominant cell population, but fibroblasts were most abundant at subsequent time points. At week 4, the scaffold supported inflammation modulation as indicated by M1 to M2 macrophage polarization; the foreign body giant cell response resolved by week 9. Unexpectedly, a fibroblast subpopulation expressed macrophage phenotypic markers, following a similar trend in transitioning from a proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotype. Also, α-smooth muscle actin-expressing myofibroblasts were abundant at weeks 4 and 9, mirroring collagen expression and remodeling activity. MBM supported physiologic responses observed during normal wound healing, including cellular infiltration, host tissue ingrowth, remodeling of matrix proteins, and immune modulation. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 106B 716-725, 2018.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telas Cirúrgicas / Cicatrização / Teste de Materiais / Epitélio / Alicerces Teciduais Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Assunto da revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telas Cirúrgicas / Cicatrização / Teste de Materiais / Epitélio / Alicerces Teciduais Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Assunto da revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article