Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Technical Note: Direct measurement of continuous TMR data with a 1D tank and automated couch movements.
Knutson, Nels C; Schmidt, Matthew C; Belley, Matthew D; Nguyen, Ngoc B; Li, H Harold; Sajo, Erno; Price, Michael J.
Afiliação
  • Knutson NC; Medical Physics Program, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01852, USA.
  • Schmidt MC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
  • Belley MD; Department of Physics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
  • Nguyen NB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
  • Li HH; Medical Physics Program, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01852, USA.
  • Sajo E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
  • Price MJ; Varian Medical Systems, Education Department, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA.
Med Phys ; 44(7): 3861-3865, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28429391
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Real-time dynamic control of the linear accelerator, couch, and imaging parameters during radiation delivery was investigated as a novel technique for acquiring tissue maximum ratio (TMR) data.

METHODS:

TrueBeam Developer Mode (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to control the linear accelerator using the Extensible Markup Language (XML). A single XML file was used to dynamically manipulate the machine, couch, and imaging parameters during radiation delivery. A TG-51 compliant 1D water tank was placed on the treatment couch, and used to position a detector at isocenter at a depth of 24.5 cm. A depth scan was performed towards the water surface. Via XML control, the treatment couch vertical position was simultaneously lowered at the same rate, maintaining the detector position at isocenter, allowing for the collection of TMR data. To ensure the detector remained at isocenter during the delivery, the in-room camera was used to monitor the detector. Continuous kV fluoroscopic images during 10 test runs further confirmed this result. TMR data at multiple Source to Detector Distances (SDD) and scan speeds were acquired to investigate their impact on the TMR data. Percentage depth dose (PDD) scans (for conversion to TMR) along with traditional discrete TMR data were acquired as a standard for comparison.

RESULTS:

More than 99.8% of the measured points had a gamma value (1%/1 mm) < 1 when compared with discrete or PDD converted TMR data. Fluoroscopic images showed that the concurrent couch and tank movements resulted in SDD errors < 1 mm. TMRs acquired at SDDs of 99, 100, and 101 cm showed differences less than 0.004.

CONCLUSION:

TrueBeam Developer Mode was used to collect continuous TMR data with the same accuracy as traditionally collected discrete data, but yielded higher sampled resolution and reduced acquisition time. This novel method does not require the modification of any equipment and does not use a 3D tank or reservoir.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Automação / Dosímetros de Radiação Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Automação / Dosímetros de Radiação Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos