Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Therapy Sequence with Alkylating Agents and MGMT Status in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Krug, Sebastian; Boch, Michael; Rexin, Peter; Gress, Thomas M; Michl, Patrick; Rinke, Anja.
Afiliação
  • Krug S; Department of Internal Medicine I, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
  • Boch M; Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
  • Rexin P; Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
  • Gress TM; Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
  • Michl P; Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
  • Rinke A; Department of Internal Medicine I, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany patrick.michl@uk-halle.de.
Anticancer Res ; 37(5): 2491-2500, 2017 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476818
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

Alkylating chemotherapeutics with either a streptozotocin-(STZ) or temozolomide-(TEM) backbone are routinely used in patients with progressive and unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET). In addition, dacarbazine (DTIC) was described as an alternative alkylating therapy option for PNETs. The optimal treatment sequence with alkylating compounds and a potential use of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) level as predictive biomarker have not yet been sufficiently elucidated. The aim of our study was the evaluation of therapy sequence with either STZ-based treatment followed by DTIC (group A) or the inverse schedule with upfront DTIC (group B) and to correlate MGMT status with clinicopathological characteristics and response to therapy. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) who were treated with STZ-based therapy and DTIC. Additionally, in a second group MGMT immunohistochemistry was performed from primary and metastatic tumor sites. For statistical evaluation Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression methods and Fisher's exact test were used.

RESULTS:

There was no difference of objective response and disease control between either STZ-based therapy followed by DTIC treatment (group A) after progression or the reverse sequence (group B). Median time to progression (TTP) was estimated to be 21 months in both arms. First-line STZ-based chemotherapy was not superior to first-line DTIC treatment (16 vs. 13 months; p=0.8). MGMT status did not correlate with clinicopathological characteristics or response to therapy with these alkylating agents.

CONCLUSION:

Upfront chemotherapy with either STZ-based treatment or DTIC monotherapy showed similar efficacy and median TTP rates. In this study, MGMT protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry did not play an important role as a predictive marker for alkylating agents.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metilases de Modificação do DNA / Estreptozocina / Tumores Neuroendócrinos / Antineoplásicos Alquilantes / Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor / Dacarbazina / Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metilases de Modificação do DNA / Estreptozocina / Tumores Neuroendócrinos / Antineoplásicos Alquilantes / Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor / Dacarbazina / Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha