Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External beam radiation therapy with or without low-dose-rate brachytherapy: Analysis of favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
Abugharib, Ahmed E; Dess, Robert T; Soni, Payal D; Narayana, Vrinda; Evans, Cheryl; Gaber, Mohamed S; Feng, Felix Y; McLaughlin, Patrick W; Spratt, Daniel E.
Afiliação
  • Abugharib AE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt.
  • Dess RT; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Soni PD; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Narayana V; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Evans C; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Gaber MS; Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt.
  • Feng FY; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • McLaughlin PW; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Spratt DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: sprattda@med.umich.edu.
Brachytherapy ; 16(4): 782-789, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499487
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the tumor control and toxicity in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with either external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or EBRT plus low-dose-rate brachytherapy (combo-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1995 and 2012, 579 men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with either EBRT (n = 388) or combo-RT (n = 191). Outcomes assessed included biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and cumulative incidence of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal toxicity. Favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk subgroups were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Median followup was 7.5 years. Combo-RT group had improved 10-year bRFS compared with EBRT (91.7% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, combo-RT (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.25, 0.92; p = 0.03) was associated with improved bRFS. Combo-RT had significantly improved bRFS compared with EBRT in the unfavorable subgroup (p = 0.02) but not in the favorable subgroup (p = 0.37). DMFS was similar within the entire cohort and by risk group. Combo-RT was associated with an increased rate in the 6-year cumulative incidence of Grade 3 GU toxicity (hazard ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval 1.1, 11.1; p = 0.026); however, 57% of Grade 3 GU toxicity was resolved, 29% had partial improvement, and only 1 patient had persistent Grade 3 GU toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS:

In intermediate-risk prostate cancer, combo-RT improved bRFS but not DMFS and increased Grade 3 GU toxicity. The bRFS benefit was limited to unfavorable intermediate-risk patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Egito

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Egito
...