Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification and segmentation of myelinated nerve fibers in a cross-sectional optical microscopic image using a deep learning model.
Naito, Tatsuhiko; Nagashima, Yu; Taira, Kenichiro; Uchio, Naohiro; Tsuji, Shoji; Shimizu, Jun.
Afiliação
  • Naito T; The Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 1138655, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: tanaitou-tky@umin.ac.jp.
  • Nagashima Y; The Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 1138655, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Taira K; The Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 1138655, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Uchio N; The Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 1138655, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tsuji S; The Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 1138655, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Shimizu J; The Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 1138655, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Neurosci Methods ; 291: 141-149, 2017 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837816
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The morphometric analysis of myelinated nerve fibers of peripheral nerves in cross-sectional optical microscopic images is valuable. Several automated methods for nerve fiber identification and segmentation have been reported. This paper presents a new method that uses a deep learning model of a convolutional neural network (CNN). We tested it for human sural nerve biopsy images.

METHODS:

The method comprises four

steps:

normalization, clustering segmentation, myelinated nerve fiber identification, and clump splitting. A normalized sample image was separated into individual objects with clustering segmentation. Each object was applied to a CNN deep learning model that labeled myelinated nerve fibers as positive and other structures as negative. Only positives proceeded to the next step. For pretraining the model, 70,000 positive and negative data each from 39 samples were used. The accuracy of the proposed algorithm was evaluated using 10 samples that were not part of the training set. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

The total true-positive rate (TPR) for the detection of myelinated fibers was 0.982, and the total false-positive rate was 0.016. The defined total area similarity (AS) and area overlap error of segmented myelin sheaths were 0.967 and 0.068, respectively. In all but one sample, there were no significant differences in estimated morphometric parameters obtained from our method and manual segmentation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

METHODS:

The TPR and AS were higher than those obtained using previous methods.

CONCLUSIONS:

High-performance automated identification and segmentation of myelinated nerve fibers were achieved using a deep learning model.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão / Aprendizado de Máquina / Microscopia / Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Methods Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão / Aprendizado de Máquina / Microscopia / Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Methods Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article