Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discrepancy Between European Association of Urology Guidelines and Daily Practice in the Management of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a European Survey.
Hendricksen, Kees; Aziz, Atiqullah; Bes, Perrine; Chun, Felix K-H; Dobruch, Jakub; Kluth, Luis A; Gontero, Paolo; Necchi, Andrea; Noon, Aidan P; van Rhijn, Bas W G; Rink, Michael; Roghmann, Florian; Rouprêt, Morgan; Seiler, Roland; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Qvick, Brian; Babjuk, Marek; Xylinas, Evanguelos.
Afiliação
  • Hendricksen K; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: k.hendricksen@nki.nl.
  • Aziz A; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bes P; Ipsen Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Chun FK; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Dobruch J; Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, European Health Centre Otwock, Poland.
  • Kluth LA; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Gontero P; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.
  • Necchi A; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Noon AP; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • van Rhijn BWG; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rink M; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Roghmann F; Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany.
  • Rouprêt M; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris 6, Paris, France.
  • Seiler R; Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Qvick B; Ipsen Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Babjuk M; Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Praha Motol University, Praha, Czech Republic.
  • Xylinas E; Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Eur Urol Focus ; 5(4): 681-688, 2019 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29074050
BACKGROUND: The European Association of Urology (EAU) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) guidelines are meant to help minimise morbidity and improve the care of patients with NMIBC. However, there may be underuse of guideline-recommended care in this potentially curable cohort. OBJECTIVE: To assess European physicians' current practice in the management of NMIBC and evaluate its concordance with the EAU 2013 guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Initial 45-min telephone interviews were conducted with 20 urologists to develop a 26-item questionnaire for a 30-min online quantitative interview. A total of 498 physicians with predefined experience in treatment of NMIBC patients, from nine European countries, completed the online interviews. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics of absolute numbers and percentages of the use of diagnostic tools, risk group stratification, treatment options chosen, and follow-up regimens were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Guidelines are used by ≥87% of physicians, with the EAU guidelines being the most used ones (71-100%). Cystoscopy (60-97%) and ultrasonography (42-95%) are the most used diagnostic techniques. Using EAU risk classification, 40-69% and 88-100% of physicians correctly identify all the prognostic factors for low- and high-risk tumours, respectively. Re-transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (re-TURB) is performed in 25-75% of low-risk and 55-98% of high-risk patients. Between 21% and 88% of patients received a single instillation of chemotherapy within 24h after TURB. Adjuvant intravesical treatment is not given to 6-62%, 2-33%, and 1-20% of the patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk NMIBC, respectively. Patients with low-risk NMIBC are likely to be overmonitored and those with high-risk NMIBC undermonitored. Our study is limited by the possible recall bias of the selected physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Although most European physicians claim to apply the EAU guidelines, adherence to them is low in daily practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our survey among European physicians investigated discrepancies between guidelines and daily practice in the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We conclude that the use of the recommended diagnostic tools, risk-stratification of NMIBC, and performance of re-TURB have been adopted, but adjuvant intravesical treatment and follow-up are not uniformly applied.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Padrões de Prática Médica / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Focus Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Padrões de Prática Médica / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Focus Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Holanda