Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using Venus-A valve for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis].
Song, G Y; Wang, M Y; Wang, Y; Liu, X B; Feng, Y; Kong, X Q; Wu, Y J.
Afiliação
  • Song GY; Coronary Intervention Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi ; 45(10): 843-847, 2017 Oct 24.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29081172
Objective: To evaluate the effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) using Venus-A valve for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive severe aortic stenosis patients with high surgical risk(Society of Thoracic Surgeon(STS) score ≥4%) or at prohibitive surgical risk were enrolled from 5 academic cardiovascular centers in China(Fuwai hospital, the second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine, West China hospital of Sichuan university, the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing medical university, Ruijin hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong university school of medicine) from September 2012 to January 2015, and Venus-A valves were used in TAVR for these patients. The primary endpoints were death from any cause and major stroke in 1 year. The secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety of TAVR in 1 year. Results: TAVR success rate was 97.9%(98/101), and 3 patients were transferred to receive surgical AVR. There were 85 patients using 1 Venus-A valve, and 13 patients underwent valve-in-valve implantation using 2 Venus-A valves. There were 1 case(1.0%) of stroke, 2 cases(2.0%)of acute myocardial infarction, 5 cases(5.0%) of pericardial effusion, 6 cases(5.9%) of severe vascular complication, and 2 cases(2.0%) of death after 7 days of TAVR. Meanwhile, aortic pressure gradient derived from echocardiography was significantly reduced when compared with pre-procedure level(11(8, 15) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. 59(45, 71)mmHg, P<0.01), and there was no aortic root rupture or leaflets thrombosis. Rate of NYHA functional class ≤Ⅱ improvements were observed at 6 months follow-up when compared with pre-procedure(94.4%(84/89)vs. 21.3%(21/89), P<0.01). The primary endpoint was 7.9%(8/11), and the incidence of all cause death and stroke was 5.9%(6/101) and 2.0%(2/101) respectively at 1 year after the procedure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that cumulative survival rate was 94.1% at 1 year after the procedure. Conclusion: TAVR using Venus-A valve for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis is effective and safe in the early and medium term post procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: China