Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of rheumatologist-performed ultrasound on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine clinical practice.
Kelly, Stephen; Davidson, Brian; Keidel, Sarah; Gadola, Stephan; Gorman, Claire; Meenagh, Gary; Reynolds, Piero.
Afiliação
  • Kelly S; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. Stephen.kelly@bartshealth.nhs.uk.
  • Davidson B; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Keidel S; Abbvie Limited, Maidenhead, UK.
  • Gadola S; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Gorman C; Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Meenagh G; Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, Northern Ireland, UK.
  • Reynolds P; Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 487, 2017 Nov 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29166885
BACKGROUND: Rheumatologists increasingly perform ultrasound (US) imaging to aid diagnosis and management decisions. There is a need to determine the role of US in facilitating early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. This study describes the impact of US use by rheumatologists on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine UK clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in four secondary care rheumatology clinics, each with one consultant who routinely used US and one who did not. Consenting patients aged > 18, newly referred with suspected inflammatory arthritis were included. Data were collected both retrospectively from medical records and via a prospectively-completed physician questionnaire on US use. Analyses were stratified by US/non-US groups and by sub-population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-diagnosed patients. RESULTS: 258 patients were included; 134 US and 124 non-US. 42% (56/134) of US and 47% (58/124) of non-US were diagnosed with RA. Results described for US and non-US cohorts, respectively as follows. The proportion of patients diagnosed at their first clinic visit was 37% vs 19% overall (p = 0.004) and 41% vs 19% in RA-diagnosed patients (p = 0.01). The median time to diagnosis (months) was 0.85 vs 2.00 (overall, p = 0.0046) and 0.23 vs 1.38 (RA-diagnosed, p = 0.0016). Median time (months) to initiation on a DMARD (where initiated) was 0.62 vs 1.41 (overall, p = 0.0048) and 0.46 vs 1.81 (RA-diagnosed, p = 0.0007). CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis, routine US use in newly referred patients seems to be associated with significantly earlier diagnosis and DMARD initiation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Reumatologia / Gerenciamento Clínico / Reumatologistas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Reumatologia / Gerenciamento Clínico / Reumatologistas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido