Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of an intraarticular catheter on fast-track primary knee arthroplasty, is it a step forward? / Uso de catéter intraarticular en fast track de artroplastia primaria de rodilla. ¿Supone un avance?
Cáceres-Sánchez, L; García-Benítez, J B; Coronado-Hijón, V; Montero-Pariente, M.
Afiliação
  • Cáceres-Sánchez L; Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe, Sevilla, España. Electronic address: libertad_caceres@hotmail.com.
  • García-Benítez JB; Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe, Sevilla, España.
  • Coronado-Hijón V; Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe, Sevilla, España.
  • Montero-Pariente M; Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe, Sevilla, España.
Article em En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29208509
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study compares the efficacy in post-operative pain control of the intraarticular catheter compared to the epidural catheter after primary total knee arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

Randomised clinical trial consisting of two groups of patients. A control group with intradural anaesthesia and an intraoperative epidural catheter (ropivacaine) and an intervention group using the same anaesthetic technique and an intraarticular catheter with an elastomeric pump (ropivacaine+dexketoprofen). Data such as demographic, anaesthetic and surgical variables, pain intensity according to Verbal Rating Scale, opioid use and complications, joint balance, onset of walking and hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS:

A lower incidence and severity on Verbal Rating Scale and a better control of postoperative pain (p<.0014) were observed in the intervention group. Joint balance also presented significant results in flexion and 74% of these patients started walking before the first 36h and the control group had not yet done so. Regarding patient satisfaction, 54.1% of the patients were "very satisfied" with the use of the catheter (p>.001). Finally, the hospital stay decreased significantly, with 33.3% of intervention group patients discharged within the first 48h compared to none of the control group. DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of the intraarticular catheter as postoperative analgesia is a useful and safe alternative. It reduces the possibility of side effects. It helps in early improvement of joint balance, onset of walking and control of pain. All of which increase patient satisfaction and result in a shorter period of hospitalisation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Trometamina / Cateterismo / Cetoprofeno / Artroplastia do Joelho / Amidas / Anestésicos Locais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Trometamina / Cateterismo / Cetoprofeno / Artroplastia do Joelho / Amidas / Anestésicos Locais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article