Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies.
Golla, Sandeep S V; Adriaanse, Sofie M; Yaqub, Maqsood; Windhorst, Albert D; Lammertsma, Adriaan A; van Berckel, Bart N M; Boellaard, Ronald.
Afiliação
  • Golla SSV; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.golla@vumc.nl.
  • Adriaanse SM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Yaqub M; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Windhorst AD; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lammertsma AA; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Berckel BNM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Boellaard R; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EJNMMI Phys ; 4(1): 30, 2017 Dec 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29209862
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

 Several criteria exist to identify the optimal model for quantification of tracer kinetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correspondence in kinetic model preference identification for brain PET studies among five model selection criteria Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), AIC unbiased (AICC), model selection criterion (MSC), Schwartz Criterion (SC), and F-test. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Six tracers were evaluated [11C]FMZ, [11C]GMOM, [11C]PK11195, [11C]Raclopride, [18F]FDG, and [11C]PHT, including data from five subjects per tracer. Time activity curves (TACs) were analysed using six plasma input models reversible single-tissue model (1T2k), irreversible two-tissue model (2T3k), and reversible two-tissue model (2T4k), all with and without blood volume fraction parameter (V B). For each tracer and criterion, the percentage of TACs preferring a certain model was calculated.

RESULTS:

For all radiotracers, strong agreement was seen across the model selection criteria. The F-test was considered as the reference, as it is a frequently used hypothesis test. The F-test confirmed the AIC preferred model in 87% of all cases. The strongest (but minimal) disagreement across regional TACs was found when comparing AIC with AICC. Despite these regional discrepancies, same preferred kinetic model was obtained using all criteria, with an exception of one FMZ subject.

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, all five model selection criteria resulted in similar conclusions with only minor differences that did not affect overall model selection.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: EJNMMI Phys Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: EJNMMI Phys Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda
...