Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of active (hot-seat) versus observer roles during simulation-based training on stress levels and non-technical performance: a randomized trial.
Bong, Choon Looi; Lee, Sumin; Ng, Agnes Suah Bwee; Allen, John Carson; Lim, Evangeline Hua Ling; Vidyarthi, Arpana.
Afiliação
  • Bong CL; 1Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899 Singapore.
  • Lee S; 1Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899 Singapore.
  • Ng ASB; 1Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899 Singapore.
  • Allen JC; 2Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, 8, College Road, Singapore, 169857 Singapore.
  • Lim EHL; 1Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899 Singapore.
  • Vidyarthi A; 3Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Adv Simul (Lond) ; 2: 7, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29450008
BACKGROUND: Active 'hands-on' participation in the 'hot-seat' during immersive simulation-based training (SBT) induces stress for participants, which is believed to be necessary to improve performance. We hypothesized that observers of SBT can subsequently achieve an equivalent level of non-technical performance as 'hot-seat' participants despite experiencing lower stress. METHODS: We randomized 37 anaesthesia trainees into two groups to undergo three consecutive SBT scenarios. Eighteen 'hot-seat' trainees actively participated in all three scenarios, and 19 'observer' trainees were directed to observe the first two scenarios and participated in the 'hot-seat' only in scenario 3. Salivary cortisol (SC) was measured at four time points during each scenario. Primary endpoint for stress response was the change in SC (ΔSC) from baseline. Performance was measured using the Anaesthetist's Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) Score. RESULTS: Mean SC increased in all participants whenever they were in the 'hot-seat' role, but not when in the observer role. Hot-seat ΔSC (mcg/dL) for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 were 0.122 (p = 0.001), 0.074 (p = 0.047), and 0.085 (p = 0.023), respectively. Observers ΔSC (mcg/dL) for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 were -0.062 (p = 0.091), 0.010 (p = 0.780), and 0.144 (p = 0.001), respectively. Mean ANTS scores were equivalent between the 'hot-seat' (40.0) and 'observer' (39.4) groups in scenario 3 (p = 0.733). CONCLUSIONS: Observers of SBT achieved an equivalent level of non-technical performance, while experiencing lower stress than trainees repeatedly trained in the 'hot-seat'. Our findings suggest that directed observers may benefit from immersive SBT even without repeated 'hands-on' experience and stress in the hot-seat. The directed observer role may offer a less stressful, practical alternative to the traditional 'hot-seat' role, potentially rendering SBT accessible to a wider audience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02211378, registered August 5, 2014, retrospectively registered.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Adv Simul (Lond) Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Adv Simul (Lond) Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido