Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Electrocardiographic differences between apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and apical non-ST segment myocardial infarction]. / Diferencias electrocardiográficas en miocardiopatía hipertrófica apical e infarto apical sin elevación del segmento ST.
Chillik, Iván; Gil Ramírez, Andreina; Ordóñez, Santiago; Tomás, Leandro; Parodi, Josefina; Costabel, Juan Pablo.
Afiliação
  • Chillik I; Departamento de Cardiología Clínica, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: ivan.chillik@gmail.com.
  • Gil Ramírez A; Departamento de Cardiología Clínica, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Ordóñez S; Departamento de Cardiología Clínica, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Tomás L; Departamento de Electrofisiología, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Parodi J; Departamento de Cardiología Clínica, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Costabel JP; Departamento de Cardiología Clínica, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 78(2): 71-75, 2018.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659354
ABSTRACT
Apocal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (AHCM) is a phenotypic variant within hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, in which ventricular repolarization alterations are present. These electrocardiographic disturbances can mimic an anterior infarction which triggers a series of studies and treatments that may be unnecessary. The aim of this study was to describe and compare electrocardiographic differences in a series of patients with AHCM and apical non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients (NSTEMI) with T-wave changes. We conducted an observational and retrospective study, including patients with diagnosed AHCM (N = 19) and apical NSTEMI (N = 19) with negative T waves in V1 and V6 lead of the EKG. Those with AHCM presented higher T-wave voltage (7 mV vs. 5 mV, p = 0.001) and peak voltage (29 mV vs. 17 mV, p = 0.003), higher R-waves (25 mV vs. 10 mV, p = 0.0001), and a maximum voltage of R and T sum (R + T) significantly higher (33 vs. 14, p = 0.00001). They also showed a greater T-wave asymmetry, with a TiTp / TpTf ratio > 1. At a cut-off value of 26.5 mV for the R + T variable, 68% sensitivity and 100% specificity were obtained to diagnose AHCM. This study shows the existence of major differences in electrocardiographic presentation of AHCM and apical NSTEMI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica / Eletrocardiografia / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Revista: Medicina (B Aires) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica / Eletrocardiografia / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Revista: Medicina (B Aires) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article