Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography.
Sarno, A; Mettivier, G; Di Lillo, F; Bliznakova, K; Sechopoulos, I; Russo, P.
Afiliação
  • Sarno A; Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Università di Napoli Federico II & INFN Sez. di Napoli, I-80126 Napoli, Italy.
  • Mettivier G; Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Università di Napoli Federico II & INFN Sez. di Napoli, I-80126 Napoli, Italy. Electronic address: mettivier@na.infn.it.
  • Di Lillo F; Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Università di Napoli Federico II & INFN Sez. di Napoli, I-80126 Napoli, Italy.
  • Bliznakova K; Laboratory of Computer Simulations in Medicine, Technical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.
  • Sechopoulos I; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre and Dutch Expert Centre for Screening (LRCB), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Russo P; Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Università di Napoli Federico II & INFN Sez. di Napoli, I-80126 Napoli, Italy.
Phys Med ; 51: 56-63, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29705184
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare, via Monte Carlo simulations, homogeneous and non-homogenous breast models adopted for mean glandular dose (MGD) estimates in mammography vs. patient specific digital breast phantoms.

METHODS:

We developed a GEANT4 Monte Carlo code simulating four homogenous cylindrical breast models featured as follows (1) semi-cylindrical section enveloped in a 5-mm adipose layer; (2) semi-elliptical section with a 4-mm thick skin; (3) semi-cylindrical section with a 1.45-mm skin layer; (4) semi-cylindrical section in a 1.45-mm skin layer and 2-mm subcutaneous adipose layer. Twenty patient specific digital breast phantoms produced from a dedicated CT scanner were assumed as reference in the comparison. We simulated two spectra produced from two anode/filter combinations. An additional digital breast phantom was produced via BreastSimulator software.

RESULTS:

With reference to the results for patient-specific breast phantoms and for W/Al spectra, models #1 and #3 showed higher MGD values by about 1% (ranges [-33%; +28%] and [-31%; +30%], respectively), while for model #4 it was 2% lower (range [-34%; +26%]) and for model #2 -11% (range [-39%; +14%]), on average. On the other hand, for W/Rh spectra, models #1 and #4 showed lower MGD values by 2% and 1%, while for model #2 and #3 it was 14% and 8% lower, respectively (ranges [-43%; +13%] and [-41%; +21%]). The simulation with the digital breast phantom produced with BreastSimulator showed a MGD overestimation of +33%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The homogeneous breast models led to maximum MGD underestimation and overestimation of 43% and 28%, respectively, when compared to patient specific breast phantoms derived from clinical CT scans.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Mama / Mamografia / Método de Monte Carlo / Modelagem Computacional Específica para o Paciente Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Mama / Mamografia / Método de Monte Carlo / Modelagem Computacional Específica para o Paciente Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
...