Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can radiological technologists serve as primary screeners of low-dose computed tomography for the diagnosis of lung cancer?
Arai, T; Nagashima, C; Muramatsu, Y; Murao, K; Yamaguchi, I; Ushio, N; Hanai, K; Kaneko, M.
Afiliação
  • Arai T; Center Hospital of the National Center to Global Health and Medicine, Toyama Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagashima C; National Cancer Center Japan Tsukiji Campus, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Muramatsu Y; National Cancer Center Japan Kashiwa Campus, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi Chiba, Japan.
  • Murao K; National Institute of Informatics, Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamaguchi I; Butsuryo College of Osaka, Otorikitamachi, Sakai-shi, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ushio N; Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital Hospital, Otsu-shi, seta, tukinowa-cho, Shiga, Japan.
  • Hanai K; Fukujiji Hospital, Matsuyama, Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kaneko M; Tokyo Health Service Association, Ichigayasadoharacho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 26(6): 909-917, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30103369
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Accreditation Council for Lung Cancer CT Screening of Japan established guidelines for the certification of Radiological Technologists in 2009.

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the trends in examination pass rates of the Radiological Technologists and discuss the reasons.

METHODS:

The cohort comprised 1593 Radiological Technologists (as examinees) based on 10-year of data (with a total of 17 examination runs). First, the examinees' written test results were analyzed. Second, an abnormal finding detection test was conducted using >100 client PCs connected to a dedicated server containing low-dose lung cancer CT screening images of 60 cases. The passing scores were correct answer rate >60% and sensitivity (TP) of >90%, respectively.

RESULTS:

Overall, 1243 examinees passed with an overall rate of 78%. The average pass rate for the written test was 91%, whereas that for the abnormal findings detection test was 85%. There was a moderate correlation between the test pass rate and average years of clinical experience of the examinees for the abnormal findings detection test (R = 0.558), whereas no such correlation existed for the written test (R = 0.105).

CONCLUSIONS:

In order for accredited Radiological Technologists to serve as primary screeners of low-dose computed tomography, it is important to revise the educational system according to current standard practices.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tecnologia Radiológica / Pessoal de Saúde / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Xray Sci Technol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tecnologia Radiológica / Pessoal de Saúde / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Xray Sci Technol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão