Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.
Emery, Paul; Pope, Janet E; Kruger, Klaus; Lippe, Ralph; DeMasi, Ryan; Lula, Sadiq; Kola, Blerina.
Afiliação
  • Emery P; Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. p.emery@leeds.ac.uk.
  • Pope JE; University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  • Kruger K; Faculty of Medicine of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Lippe R; Pfizer, Berlin, Germany.
  • DeMasi R; Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
  • Lula S; Envision Pharma Group, London, UK.
  • Kola B; Pfizer, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Adv Ther ; 35(10): 1535-1563, 2018 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30128641
ABSTRACT
Despite recommendations suggesting that biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) should be used in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), up to one-third of patients with RA are treated with monotherapy. The objective of the systematic literature review reported here was to evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs as monotherapy in the treatment of RA. MEDLINE®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Central Trials Register (to April 11, 2017) and the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism conference proceedings (2010-2016) were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs as monotherapy for RA in adults. Forty-four monotherapy studies of abatacept, adalimumab, baricitinib, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, sarilumab, sirukumab, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib reported in 71 publications were identified. Tocilizumab had the most studies (14), followed by etanercept (10) and adalimumab (9). These b/tsDMARDs were consistently shown to be efficacious treatments, regardless of whether patients were intolerant of or had never used conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs. However, better treatment outcomes were usually achieved with combination therapy, and this was observed for all b/tsDMARDs assessed by this review. Only a few studies provided a head-to-head comparison between b/tsDMARD treatments or between b/tsDMARD monotherapy and combination therapy, and as many were initial RA treatments they were not generalizable to usual care. In conclusion, evidence from randomized trials suggests that the b/tsDMARDs studied are effective as monotherapy. In general, some patient responses seem better with combination therapy and the durability of monotherapy is less than combination therapy. There is, however, a need for longer-term head-to-head trials to establish positioning of these interventions in the treatment algorithm for RA.

FUNDING:

Pfizer.Plain Language

Summary:

Plain language summary available on the journal website.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Produtos Biológicos / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Adv Ther Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Produtos Biológicos / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Adv Ther Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido