Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The age-calibrated measured glomerular filtration rate improves living kidney donation selection process.
Gaillard, François; Courbebaisse, Marie; Kamar, Nassim; Rostaing, Lionel; Del Bello, Arnaud; Girerd, Sophie; Kessler, Michèle; Flamant, Martin; Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle; Peraldi, Marie-Noelle; Couzi, Lionel; Merville, Pierre; Malvezzi, Paolo; Janbon, Benedicte; Moulin, Bruno; Caillard, Sophie; Gatault, Philippe; Büchler, Matthias; Maillard, Nicolas; Dubourg, Laurence; Roquet, Olga; Garrouste, Cyril; Legendre, Christophe; Delanaye, Pierre; Mariat, Christophe.
Afiliação
  • Gaillard F; Renal Transplantation Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Necker Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France. Electronic address: gaillard-francois@hotmail.fr.
  • Courbebaisse M; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Physiology Department, AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 1151, Paris, France.
  • Kamar N; Departments of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rangueil, Toulouse, France; INSERM U1043, Institut Fédératif de Recherche - BioMédicale de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
  • Rostaing L; Nephrology and Transplantation Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
  • Del Bello A; Departments of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
  • Girerd S; Nephrology Department, CHU Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Kessler M; Nephrology Department, CHU Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Flamant M; Physiology Department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Vidal-Petiot E; Physiology Department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Peraldi MN; Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Nephrology and Transplantation Department, AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Couzi L; Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France; Immuno ConcEpT, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 5164, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
  • Merville P; Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France; Immuno ConcEpT, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 5164, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
  • Malvezzi P; Nephrology and Transplantation Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
  • Janbon B; Nephrology and Transplantation Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
  • Moulin B; Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Caillard S; Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Gatault P; Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, and EA4245 Cellules Dendritiques, Immunomodulation et Greffes, François Rabelais University, Tours, France.
  • Büchler M; Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, and EA4245 Cellules Dendritiques, Immunomodulation et Greffes, François Rabelais University, Tours, France.
  • Maillard N; Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Department, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Jean Monnet University, Communauté d'Universités et Etablissements Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Dubourg L; Exploration Fonctionnelle Rénale et Métabolique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; UMR 5305 CNRS/Université Claude-Bernard, Lyon I, Biologie Tissulaire et Ingénierie Thérapeutique, Lyon, France.
  • Roquet O; Exploration Fonctionnelle Rénale et Métabolique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Garrouste C; Nephrology Department, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Legendre C; Renal Transplantation Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Necker Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Delanaye P; Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, University of Liège (CHU ULg), Liège, Belgium.
  • Mariat C; Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Department, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Jean Monnet University, Communauté d'Universités et Etablissements Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Kidney Int ; 94(3): 616-624, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30143068
ABSTRACT
Recommendations on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) threshold compatible with living kidney donation are not agreed upon. The recent KDIGO guidelines suggested a reset of the conventional cutoff value of 80 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. While GFR physiologically declines with age, it is unclear whether and how age should be taken into account for selecting acceptable pre-donation GFR. In this multicenter retrospective study encompassing 2007 kidney donors in France, we evaluated the impact of age using two threshold measured GFR (mGFR)s (80 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Three groups of donors were defined according to baseline mGFR below 80, 80-89.9 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more. Thirty-two percent of donors were selected despite an mGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Donors with the lowest mGFR were significantly older (60 ± 9 vs. 47 ± 11 years) and this applied to both male and female donors. The lifetime-standardized renal reserve, defined as the pre-donation mGFR value divided by the expected number of remaining years of life, was similar irrespective of baseline mGFR groups. Similar results were obtained when eGFR was used instead of mGFR. Finally, in a subgroup of 132 donors with repeated mGFR five years after donation, the magnitude of mGFR decrease was similar in all groups (-34.3%, -33.9%, and -34.9% respectively). Thus, the decision to accept individuals with mGFR lower than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 for kidney donation is highly dependent on the age of the candidate. Hence, threshold values lower than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 are reasonable for older donors. Age-calibrated mGFR may improve efficiency of the selection process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Doadores Vivos / Seleção do Doador / Taxa de Filtração Glomerular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Kidney Int Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Doadores Vivos / Seleção do Doador / Taxa de Filtração Glomerular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Kidney Int Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article