Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trend analysis of emergency department malpractice claims in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Wansink, Luuk; Kuypers, Maybritt I; Boeije, Tom; van den Brand, Crispijn L; de Waal, Manon; Holkenborg, Joris; Ter Avest, Ewoud.
Afiliação
  • Wansink L; Department of Emergency Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis.
  • Kuypers MI; Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
  • Boeije T; Department of Emergency Medicine, Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn.
  • van den Brand CL; Department of Emergency Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague.
  • de Waal M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg.
  • Holkenborg J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem.
  • Ter Avest E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 26(5): 350-355, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30179895
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Over the past two decades, several quality improvement projects have been implemented in emergency departments (EDs) in the Netherlands, one of these being the training and deployment of emergency physicians. In this study we aim to perform a trend analysis of ED quality of care in Dutch hospitals, as measured by the incidence of medical malpractice claims. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study of malpractice claims in five Dutch EDs over the period 1998-2014. Incidence risk ratios were calculated to demonstrate any relation of specific quality improvement initiatives with the primary outcome, defined as the number of claims per 10 000 ED visits per year.

RESULTS:

During the study period, the cumulative number of ED visits increased significantly from 99 145 in 1998 to 162 490 in 2014 (P < 0.01). In total, 228 of 2 348 417 ED visits (0.97 per 10 000) resulted in a malpractice claim. At the same time, the yearly number of ED claims filed decreased with 0.07 (0.03-0.10) per 10 000 each year. The claim rate was higher in the period before emergency physicians were employed in the ED [1.18 (0.98-1.41) claims per 10 000 visits] compared with the period after they were employed [0.81 (0.67-0.97), incidence risk ratio 0.69 (0.53-0.89), P < 0.01].

CONCLUSION:

Even though the number of ED visits increased significantly over the past two decades, the number of malpractice claims filed after an ED visit decreased. Various quality improvement initiatives, including the training and employment of emergency physicians, may have contributed to the observed decrease in claims.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Revisão da Utilização de Seguros / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Imperícia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Emerg Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Revisão da Utilização de Seguros / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Imperícia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Emerg Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article