Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pesticide Exposure Assessment Paradigm for Solitary Bees.
Sgolastra, Fabio; Hinarejos, Silvia; Pitts-Singer, Theresa L; Boyle, Natalie K; Joseph, Timothy; Luckmann, Johannes; Raine, Nigel E; Singh, Rajwinder; Williams, Neal M; Bosch, Jordi.
Afiliação
  • Sgolastra F; Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agro-Alimentari, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Hinarejos S; Valent U.S.A. LLC, Dublin, CA.
  • Pitts-Singer TL; USDA ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT.
  • Boyle NK; USDA ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT.
  • Joseph T; Landis on behalf Mitsui, Greensboro, NC.
  • Luckmann J; RIFCON GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany.
  • Raine NE; School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Singh R; BASF, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • Williams NM; Department of Entomology and Nematology, University California Davis, Davis, CA.
  • Bosch J; Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, CREAF, Edifici C, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Spain.
Environ Entomol ; 48(1): 22-35, 2019 02 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30508080
ABSTRACT
Current pesticide risk assessment for bees relies on a single (social) species, the western honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera Apidae). However, most of the >20,000 bee species worldwide are solitary. Differences in life history traits between solitary bees (SB) and honey bees (HB) are likely to determine differences in routes and levels of pesticide exposure. The objectives of this review are to 1) compare SB and HB life history traits relevant for risk assessment; 2) summarize current knowledge about levels of pesticide exposure for SB and HB; 3) identify knowledge gaps and research needs; 4) evaluate whether current HB risk assessment schemes cover routes and levels of exposure of SB; and 5) identify potential SB model species for risk assessment. Most SB exposure routes seem well covered by current HB risk assessment schemes. Exceptions to this are exposure routes related to nesting substrates and nesting materials used by SB. Exposure via soil is of particular concern because most SB species nest underground. Six SB species (Hymenoptera Megachilidae - Osmia bicornis L., O. cornifrons Radoszkowski, O. cornuta Latreille, O. lignaria Say, Megachile rotundata F., and Halictidae - Nomia melanderi Cockerell) are commercially available and could be used in risk assessment. Of these, only N. melanderi nests underground, and the rest are cavity-nesters. However, the three Osmia species collect soil to build their nests. Life history traits of cavity-nesting species make them particularly suitable for semifield and, to a lesser extent, field tests. Future studies should address basic biology, rearing methods and levels of exposure of ground-nesting SB species.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Praguicidas / Abelhas / Exposição Ambiental Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Environ Entomol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Praguicidas / Abelhas / Exposição Ambiental Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Environ Entomol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM