Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The same or different psychiatrists for in- and out-patient treatment? A multi-country natural experiment.
Giacco, D; Bird, V J; Ahmad, T; Bauer, M; Lasalvia, A; Lorant, V; Miglietta, E; Moskalewicz, J; Nicaise, P; Pfennig, A; Welbel, M; Priebe, S.
Afiliação
  • Giacco D; Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Bird VJ; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK.
  • Ahmad T; Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Bauer M; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK.
  • Lasalvia A; Queen Mary University of London, Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.
  • Lorant V; Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University, London (Whitechapel Campus), Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK.
  • Miglietta E; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
  • Moskalewicz J; UOC Psichiatria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona VR, Italy.
  • Nicaise P; Institute of Health and Society IRSS, Université Catholique de Louvain, "Ecole de Santé Publique", Clos Chapelle-aux-champs, 30 bte 30.15 - 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Pfennig A; Section of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Welbel M; Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, ul. Sobieskiego 9, 02-957 Warsaw, Poland.
  • Priebe S; Institute of Health and Society IRSS, Université Catholique de Louvain, "Ecole de Santé Publique", Clos Chapelle-aux-champs, 30 bte 30.15 - 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 29: e10, 2018 Dec 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30560756
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

A core question in the debate about how to organise mental healthcare is whether in- and out-patient treatment should be provided by the same (personal continuity) or different psychiatrists (specialisation). The controversial debate drives costly organisational changes in several European countries, which have gone in opposing directions. The existing evidence is based on small and low-quality studies which tend to favour whatever the new experimental organisation is.We compared 1-year clinical outcomes of personal continuity and specialisation in routine care in a large scale study across five European countries.

METHODS:

This is a 1-year prospective natural experiment conducted in Belgium, England, Germany, Italy and Poland. In all these countries, both personal continuity and specialisation exist in routine care. Eligible patients were admitted for psychiatric in-patient treatment (18 years of age), and clinically diagnosed with a psychotic, mood or anxiety/somatisation disorder.Outcomes were assessed 1 year after the index admission. The primary outcome was re-hospitalisation and analysed for the full sample and subgroups defined by country, and different socio-demographic and clinical criteria. Secondary outcomes were total number of inpatient days, involuntary re-admissions, adverse events and patients' social situation. Outcomes were compared through mixed regression models in intention-to-treat analyses. The study is registered (ISRCTN40256812).

RESULTS:

We consecutively recruited 7302 patients; 6369 (87.2%) were followed-up. No statistically significant differences were found in re-hospitalisation, neither overall (adjusted percentages 38.9% in personal continuity, 37.1% in specialisation; odds ratio = 1.08; confidence interval 0.94-1.25; p = 0.28) nor for any of the considered subgroups. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Whether the same or different psychiatrists provide in- and out-patient treatment appears to have no substantial impact on patient outcomes over a 1-year period. Initiatives to improve long-term outcomes of psychiatric patients may focus on aspects other than the organisation of personal continuity v. specialisation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatoriais / Psiquiatria / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente / Pacientes Internados / Transtornos Mentais / Serviços de Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatoriais / Psiquiatria / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente / Pacientes Internados / Transtornos Mentais / Serviços de Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
...