Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in the characterization of a polypectomy scar: A single-blind observational study.
Riu Pons, Fausto; Andreu, Montserrat; Gimeno Beltran, Javier; Álvarez-Gonzalez, Marco Antonio; Seoane Urgorri, Agustín; Dedeu, Josep Maria; Barranco Priego, Luis; Bessa, Xavier.
Afiliação
  • Riu Pons F; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Andreu M; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Gimeno Beltran J; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Álvarez-Gonzalez MA; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Seoane Urgorri A; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Dedeu JM; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Barranco Priego L; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
  • Bessa X; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
World J Gastroenterol ; 24(45): 5179-5188, 2018 Dec 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30568394
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To assess the incremental benefit of narrow band imaging (NBI) and white light endoscopy (WLE), randomizing the initial technique for the detection of residual neoplasia at the polypectomy scar after an endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR).

METHODS:

We conducted an observational study in an academic center to assess the incremental benefit of NBI and WLE randomly applied 11 (NBI-WLE or WLE-NBI) in the follow-up of a post-EPMR scar by the same endoscopist.

RESULTS:

A total of 112 EPMR scars were included. The median baseline polyp size was 20 mm (interquartile range 14-30). At first review, NBI and WLE showed good sensitivity (85.0% vs 78.9%), specificity (77.1% vs 84.2%) and overall accuracy (80.0% vs 82.5%). NBI after WLE (WLE-NBI group) improved accuracy, but this difference was not statistically significant [area under the curve (AUC) 86.8% vs 81.6%, P = 0.15]. WLE after NBI (NBI-WLE group) did not improve accuracy (AUC 81.4% vs 81.1%, P = 0.9). Overall, recurrence was found in 39/112 (34.8%) lesions.

CONCLUSION:

Although no statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques at the first post-EPMR assessment, the use of NBI after WLE may improve residual neoplasia detection. Nevertheless, biopsy is still required in the first scar review.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo / Colonoscopia / Cicatriz / Imagem de Banda Estreita / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastroenterol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo / Colonoscopia / Cicatriz / Imagem de Banda Estreita / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastroenterol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA