Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A framework for automated anomaly detection in high frequency water-quality data from in situ sensors.
Leigh, Catherine; Alsibai, Omar; Hyndman, Rob J; Kandanaarachchi, Sevvandi; King, Olivia C; McGree, James M; Neelamraju, Catherine; Strauss, Jennifer; Talagala, Priyanga Dilini; Turner, Ryan D R; Mengersen, Kerrie; Peterson, Erin E.
Afiliação
  • Leigh C; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Br
  • Alsibai O; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Hyndman RJ; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kandanaarachchi S; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • King OC; Water Quality and Investigations, Department of Environment and Science, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.
  • McGree JM; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Neelamraju C; Water Quality and Investigations, Department of Environment and Science, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.
  • Strauss J; Water Quality and Investigations, Department of Environment and Science, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.
  • Talagala PD; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Turner RDR; Water Quality and Investigations, Department of Environment and Science, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.
  • Mengersen K; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Peterson EE; ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia; Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Br
Sci Total Environ ; 664: 885-898, 2019 May 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30769312
ABSTRACT
Monitoring the water quality of rivers is increasingly conducted using automated in situ sensors, enabling timelier identification of unexpected values or trends. However, the data are confounded by anomalies caused by technical issues, for which the volume and velocity of data preclude manual detection. We present a framework for automated anomaly detection in high-frequency water-quality data from in situ sensors, using turbidity, conductivity and river level data collected from rivers flowing into the Great Barrier Reef. After identifying end-user needs and defining anomalies, we ranked anomaly importance and selected suitable detection methods. High priority anomalies included sudden isolated spikes and level shifts, most of which were classified correctly by regression-based methods such as autoregressive integrated moving average models. However, incorporation of multiple water-quality variables as covariates reduced performance due to complex relationships among variables. Classifications of drift and periods of anomalously low or high variability were more often correct when we applied mitigation, which replaces anomalous measurements with forecasts for further forecasting, but this inflated false positive rates. Feature-based methods also performed well on high priority anomalies and were similarly less proficient at detecting lower priority anomalies, resulting in high false negative rates. Unlike regression-based methods, however, all feature-based methods produced low false positive rates and have the benefit of not requiring training or optimization. Rule-based methods successfully detected a subset of lower priority anomalies, specifically impossible values and missing observations. We therefore suggest that a combination of methods will provide optimal performance in terms of correct anomaly detection, whilst minimizing false detection rates. Furthermore, our framework emphasizes the importance of communication between end-users and anomaly detection developers for optimal outcomes with respect to both detection performance and end-user application. To this end, our framework has high transferability to other types of high frequency time-series data and anomaly detection applications.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS