Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with short and long birth intervals in Bangladesh: evidence from six Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys, 1996-2014.
Nisha, Monjura Khatun; Alam, Ashraful; Islam, Mohammad Tajul; Huda, Tanvir; Raynes-Greenow, Camille.
Afiliação
  • Nisha MK; Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Alam A; Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Islam MT; Save the Children Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Huda T; Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Raynes-Greenow C; Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 9(2): e024392, 2019 02 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30798311
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of short (<36 months) and long (≥60 months) birth intervals on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Bangladesh. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed data from six Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (1996-1997, 1999-2000, 2004, 2007, 2011 and 2014). We included all singleton non-first live births, most recently born to mothers within 5 years preceding each survey (n=21 382). We defined birth interval according to previous research which suggests that a birth interval between 36 and 59 months is the most ideal interval. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to obtain the crude and adjusted ORs (aOR) respectively to assess the odds of first-day neonatal death, early neonatal death and small birth size for both short (<36 months) and long (≥60 months) spacing between births. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First-day neonatal death, early neonatal death and small birth size. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, compared with births spaced 36-59 months, infants with a birth interval of <36 months had increased odds of first-day neonatal death (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17 to 3.78) and early neonatal death (aOR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.22). Compared with births spaced 36-59 months, infants with a birth interval of ≥60 months had increased odds of first-day neonatal death (aOR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.73) and small birth size (aOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.34). When there was a history of any previous pregnancy loss, there was an increase in the odds of first-day and early neonatal death for both short and long birth intervals, although it was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Birth intervals shorter than 36 months and longer than 59 months are associated with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Care-providers, programme managers and policymakers could focus on promoting an optimal birth interval between 36 and 59 months in postpartum family planning.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intervalo entre Nascimentos / Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional / Resultado da Gravidez / Morte Perinatal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intervalo entre Nascimentos / Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional / Resultado da Gravidez / Morte Perinatal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Reino Unido