Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of nutrition route on microaspiration in critically ill patients with shock: a planned ancillary study of the NUTRIREA-2 trial.
Nseir, Saad; Le Gouge, Amélie; Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste; Lacherade, Jean-Claude; Jaillette, Emmanuelle; Mira, Jean-Paul; Mercier, Emmanuelle; Declercq, Pierre-Louis; Sirodot, Michel; Piton, Gaël; Tinturier, François; Coupez, Elisabeth; Gaudry, Stéphane; Djibré, Michel; Thevenin, Didier; Pasco, Jeremy; Balduyck, Malika; Zerimech, Farid; Reignier, Jean.
Afiliação
  • Nseir S; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France. s-nseir@chru-lille.fr.
  • Le Gouge A; Faculté de Médicine, Université de Lille, F-59000, Lille, France. s-nseir@chru-lille.fr.
  • Lascarrou JB; Inserm CIC 1415, Tours, France.
  • Lacherade JC; Université de Tours, Tours, France.
  • Jaillette E; CHU Tours, Tours, France.
  • Mira JP; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Mercier E; Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Declercq PL; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Départemental de la Vendée, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
  • Sirodot M; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
  • Piton G; Faculté de Médicine, Université de Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
  • Tinturier F; Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cochin University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
  • Coupez E; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU Tours, Tours, France.
  • Gaudry S; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital de Dieppe, Dieppe, France.
  • Djibré M; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Genevois, Metz-Tessy, Pringy, France.
  • Thevenin D; Medical Intensive Care Unit, CHRU Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Pasco J; EA3920, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon, France.
  • Balduyck M; Surgical Intensive Care Unit, CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens, France.
  • Zerimech F; Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Reignier J; Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France.
Crit Care ; 23(1): 111, 2019 Apr 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953553
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Microaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism of entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of enteral nutrition, as compared with parenteral nutrition, on abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions.

METHODS:

Planned ancillary study of the randomized controlled multicenter NUTRIREA2 trial. Patients with shock receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive early enteral or parenteral nutrition. All tracheal aspirates were collected during the 48 h following randomization. Abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions was defined as the presence of significant levels of pepsin (> 200 ng/ml) and salivary amylase (> 1685 UI/ml) in > 30% of tracheal aspirates.

RESULTS:

A total of 151 patients were included (78 and 73 patients in enteral and parenteral nutrition groups, respectively), and 1074 tracheal aspirates were quantitatively analyzed for pepsin and amylase. Although vomiting rate was significantly higher (31% vs 15%, p = 0.016), constipation rate was significantly lower (6% vs 21%, p = 0.010) in patients with enteral than in patients with parenteral nutrition. No significant difference was found regarding other patient characteristics. The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of gastric contents was significantly lower in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (14% vs 36%, p = 0.004; unadjusted OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.69, 0.93), adjusted OR 0.79 (0.76, 0.94)). The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of oropharyngeal secretions was significantly higher in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (74% vs 54%, p = 0.026; unadjusted OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.03, 1.44), adjusted OR 1.23 (1.01, 1.48)). No significant difference was found in percentage of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia between enteral (8%) and parenteral (10%) nutrition groups (HR 0.78 (0.26, 2.28)).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that enteral and parenteral nutrition are associated with high rates of microaspiration, although oropharyngeal microaspiration was more common with enteral nutrition and gastric microaspiration was more common with parenteral nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03411447 . Registered 18 July 2017. Retrospectively registered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque / Vias de Administração de Medicamentos / Terapia Nutricional Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque / Vias de Administração de Medicamentos / Terapia Nutricional Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França