Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Revision of Syndesmosis Screw Fixation.
Bafna, Kunaal R; Jordan, Richard; Yatsonsky, David; Dick, Steven; Liu, Jiayong; Ebraheim, Nabil A.
Afiliação
  • Bafna KR; College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio (KRB, RJ, DY, SD).
  • Jordan R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio (JL, NAE).
  • Yatsonsky D; College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio (KRB, RJ, DY, SD).
  • Dick S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio (JL, NAE).
  • Liu J; College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio (KRB, RJ, DY, SD).
  • Ebraheim NA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio (JL, NAE).
Foot Ankle Spec ; 13(2): 138-143, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31006270
Background: Many syndesmosis screw fixations do not achieve success at the first attempt. Currently, there are no data available to evaluate revision of syndesmosis screw failure. Methods: A total of 160 consecutive patients who underwent syndesmosis screw fixation from 2014 to 2016 were reviewed. The current study focuses on 13 of 160 patients who underwent revision surgery and analyzes reasons, methods, and outcomes of syndesmotic screw revisions. Results: Thirteen out of 160 patients had revision surgeries. Incidence of recurrent diastasis was 92.3%. Seven out of 19 screws had broken. Two patients had screw loosening, 9 patients underwent early weightbearing, 1 patient developed osteomyelitis, 1 patient developed osteoarthritis, and 1 patient had fibular nonunion. Eleven patients underwent removal, 3 patients underwent clamp reduction, and 4 patients underwent fibular osteotomy. Six patients experienced good reduction with 0/10 pain, 3 patients experienced good reduction with some pain, 1 patient experienced poor reduction; 1 patient developed osteomyelitis and subsequent 7/10 pain; 1 patient underwent fusion with 5/10 pain, and 1 patient experienced medial malleolar mal-union with 3/10 pain. Conclusion: It was found that the main reason for syndesmosis revision was reoccurring diastasis. Most patients ultimately experienced good reduction and were able to ambulate, despite some residual pain. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Parafusos Ósseos / Fixação Interna de Fraturas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Spec Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA / PODIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Parafusos Ósseos / Fixação Interna de Fraturas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Spec Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA / PODIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos