Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts.
Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh; Aldayyen, Ali; Yenina, Kateryna; Chiappini, Adam; Khan, Tahir Mehmood.
Afiliação
  • Almulhim AS; 1King Faisal University, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aldayyen A; 2The University of Arizona, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ USA.
  • Yenina K; 1King Faisal University, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Chiappini A; 2The University of Arizona, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ USA.
  • Khan TM; 3Banner-University Medical Center South, Pharmacy Department, Tucson, USA.
J Pharm Policy Pract ; 12: 8, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31007933
INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). ED culture follow up is an important tool to provide the appropriate therapy after the identification of the causative pathogen. There is a growing body of evidence for the positive role of pharmacists in following up the ED cultures. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacist driven urine culture follow ups to the nurse-practitioner (NP) driven follow ups in term of the appropriateness of antibiotic selections in patients with resistant isolates, inappropriately treated asymptomatic bacteriuria, and inappropriately chosen antibiotic. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective pre-post intervention study divided into a two group period to compare pharmacist to NP led ED culture follow up interventions. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for analysis. Student's t-test was used for continuous variables and Chi-square test/or fisher's-exact test when appropriate were used for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (25.7%) and 102 (34%) met the inclusion criteria in the pharmacist arm and in the NP arm, respectively. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated pathogen in both arms. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was often treated in the ED in both groups (45/157, 28.7%) and there were no efforts in discontinuation of antibiotics in these patients. Neither the interventions group nor the no interventions groups were statistically different between the pharmacist and NP arms (P 0.0778), (P 0.797), respectively. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was observed between pharmacist driven monitoring and NP driven monitoring. In our institution, asymptomatic bacteriuria was commonly treated even in the absence of indications. We recommend that Pharmacists' roles in the ED cultures follow up be expanded to include antibiotic discontinuation in patients who meet asymptomatic bacteriuria criteria or have confirmed negative urine culture.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Policy Pract Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Policy Pract Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita País de publicação: Reino Unido