Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative evaluation of Airtraq™ and GlideScope® videolaryngoscopes for difficult pediatric intubation in a Pierre Robin manikin.
Desai, Neel; Johnson, Mae; Priddis, Kat; Ray, Samiran; Chigaru, Linda.
Afiliação
  • Desai N; Department of Anaesthetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK. neel_d83@hotmail.com.
  • Johnson M; Children's Acute Transport Service, Ormond House, 26-27 Boswell Street, London, UK.
  • Priddis K; Department of Anaesthetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK.
  • Ray S; Children's Acute Transport Service, Ormond House, 26-27 Boswell Street, London, UK.
  • Chigaru L; Children's Acute Transport Service, Ormond House, 26-27 Boswell Street, London, UK.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(7): 1105-1111, 2019 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31119438
ABSTRACT
Airway management in children is associated with anatomical and physiological challenges compared with adults. Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate and related to a difficult airway. Both the Airtraq™ and GlideScope® have never been previously directly compared in PRS. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of these two airway devices in a PRS manikin for ethical and practical reasons. Between April and July 2017, 26, pediatric intensive care clinical fellows or trainees from a tertiary pediatric center were recruited to participate. In this prospective and randomized crossover trial, all participants first set up the Airtraq™ and the GlideScope® and then used these videolaryngoscopes to intubate an AirSim® PRS manikin. Our primary outcome measure was the duration of the successful intubation attempt. Duration of the successful intubation attempt was 18.1 (14.2-34.9 [10.2-51.3]) s for the Airtraq™ compared to 31.1 (18.7-55.6 [6.2-119]) s for the GlideScope® (p = 0.045). Setup time was 50.0 ± 6.9 s for the Airtraq™ and 27.8 ± 8.6 s for the GlideScope® (p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Even though setup time was longer, the characteristics of intubation performance were superior with the Airtraq™ relative to the GlideScope® in an AirSim® PRS manikin. What is Known • Several case reports have described the successful use of Airtraq™ to intubate children with Pierre Robin sequence. • The GlideScope® has demonstrated similar rates of first-attempt successful intubation to flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a Pierre Robin sequence manikin. What is New • In the hands of pediatric non-airway specialists, the characteristics of intubation performance, including the duration of the successful intubation attempt, are superior with the Airtraq™ compared with the GlideScope® in a Pierre Robin sequence manikin. • Setup time for the Airtraq™ is, however, longer relative to that for the GlideScope®.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Vídeoassistida / Laringoscópios / Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias / Intubação Intratraqueal / Laringoscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Vídeoassistida / Laringoscópios / Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias / Intubação Intratraqueal / Laringoscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
...