Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multiphysics modeling toward enhanced guidance in hepatic microwave ablation: a preliminary framework.
Collins, Jarrod A; Heiselman, Jon S; Clements, Logan W; Brown, Daniel B; Miga, Michael I.
Afiliação
  • Collins JA; Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Heiselman JS; Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Clements LW; Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Brown DB; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Miga MI; Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 6(2): 025007, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31131291
We compare a surface-driven, model-based deformation correction method to a clinically relevant rigid registration approach within the application of image-guided microwave ablation for the purpose of demonstrating improved localization and antenna placement in a deformable hepatic phantom. Furthermore, we present preliminary computational modeling of microwave ablation integrated within the navigational environment to lay the groundwork for a more comprehensive procedural planning and guidance framework. To achieve this, we employ a simple, retrospective model of microwave ablation after registration, which allows a preliminary evaluation of the combined therapeutic and navigational framework. When driving registrations with full organ surface data (i.e., as could be available in a percutaneous procedure suite), the deformation correction method improved average ablation antenna registration error by 58.9% compared to rigid registration (i.e., 2.5 ± 1.1 mm , 5.6 ± 2.3 mm of average target error for corrected and rigid registration, respectively) and on average improved volumetric overlap between the modeled and ground-truth ablation zones from 67.0 ± 11.8 % to 85.6 ± 5.0 % for rigid and corrected, respectively. Furthermore, when using sparse-surface data (i.e., as is available in an open surgical procedure), the deformation correction improved registration error by 38.3% and volumetric overlap from 64.8 ± 12.4 % to 77.1 ± 8.0 % for rigid and corrected, respectively. We demonstrate, in an initial phantom experiment, enhanced navigation in image-guided hepatic ablation procedures and identify a clear multiphysics pathway toward a more comprehensive thermal dose planning and deformation-corrected guidance framework.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos