Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Second-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after First-Line FOLFIRINOX Failure.
Mita, Naoki; Iwashita, Takuji; Uemura, Shinya; Yoshida, Kensaku; Iwasa, Yuhei; Ando, Nobuhiro; Iwata, Keisuke; Okuno, Mitsuru; Mukai, Tsuyoshi; Shimizu, Masahito.
Afiliação
  • Mita N; First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. mitanao8@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Iwashita T; First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. takuji@w7.dion.ne.jp.
  • Uemura S; First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. ueshin550621@gmail.com.
  • Yoshida K; First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. kensakuyoshidaky@gmail.com.
  • Iwasa Y; First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. festinalenteyu@gmail.com.
  • Ando N; Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu 500-8717, Japan. nobuhiro5091ando@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Iwata K; Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu 500-8717, Japan. keisukeiwata@nifty.com.
  • Okuno M; Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu 500-8513, Japan. mkobdkl@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Mukai T; Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu 500-8513, Japan. tsuyomukai@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Shimizu M; First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. shimim-gif@umin.ac.jp.
J Clin Med ; 8(6)2019 May 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31146420
FOLFIRINOX (FX) and gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been reported as effective regimens for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). FX may be more effective but is also associated with more adverse events (AEs). Therefore, first-line treatment with FX followed by second-line GnP may be appropriate. AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of second-line GnP for patients with APC after first-line FX failure. METHODS: This study was a multicenter prospective phase II study evaluating second-line GnP in patients with APC after failed first-line FX. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and the frequency and degree of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty patients (14 male; median age, 64 years) were enrolled. The RR was 13.3%, with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months. The median OS and PFS were 7.6 and 3.8 months, respectively. From the beginning of first-line treatment, the median OS and PFS were 14.2 and 9.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 70% of patients. CONCLUSION: Second-line GnP after FX failure for patients with APC could be more effective than GEM alone. Further comparison studies are warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão País de publicação: Suíça