Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma.
Lancia, Carlo; Anninga, Jakob; Spitoni, Cristian; Sydes, Matthew R; Whelan, Jeremy; Hogendoorn, Pancras C W; Gelderblom, Hans; Fiocco, Marta.
Afiliação
  • Lancia C; Mathematical Institute, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Anninga J; Department Solid Tumors, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Spitoni C; Mathematical Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Sydes MR; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Whelan J; MRC London Hub for Trial Methodology Research, University College London, London, UK.
  • Hogendoorn PCW; MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
  • Gelderblom H; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Fiocco M; Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e022980, 2019 05 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152023
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In cancer studies, the target received dose intensity (tRDI) for any regimen, the intended dose and time for the regimen, is commonly taken as a proxy for achieved RDI (aRDI), the actual individual dose and time for the regimen. Evaluating tRDI/aRDI mismatches is crucial to assess study results whenever patients are stratified on allocated regimen. The manuscript develops a novel methodology to highlight and evaluate tRDI/aRDI mismatches.

DESIGN:

Retrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial, MRC BO06 (EORTC 80931).

SETTING:

Population-based study but proposed methodology can be applied to other trial designs.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 497 patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma, of which 19 were excluded because chemotherapy was not started or the estimated dose was abnormally high (>1.25 × prescribed dose).

INTERVENTIONS:

Two regimens with the same anticipated cumulative dose (doxorubicin 6×75 mg/m2/week; cisplatin 6×100 mg/m2/week) over different time schedules every 3 weeks in regimen-C and every 2 weeks in regimen-DI. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

tRDI distribution was measured across groups of patients derived from k-means clustering of treatment data. K-means creates groups of patients who are aRDI-homogeneous. The main outcome is the proportion of tRDI values in groups of homogeneous aRDI.

RESULTS:

For nearly half of the patients, there is a mismatch between tRDI and aRDI; for 21%, aRDI was closer to the tRDI of the other regimen.

CONCLUSIONS:

For MRC BO06, tRDI did not predict well aRDI. The manuscript offers an original procedure to highlight the presence of and quantify tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Caution is required to interpret the effect of chemotherapy-regimen intensification on survival outcome at an individual level where such a mismatch is present.The study relevance lies in the use of individual realisation of the intended treatment, which depends on individual delays and/or dose reductions reported throughout the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN86294690.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ósseas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Osteossarcoma / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ósseas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Osteossarcoma / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda