Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Volubility, Consonant Emergence, and Syllabic Structure in Infants and Toddlers Later Diagnosed With Childhood Apraxia of Speech, Speech Sound Disorder, and Typical Development: A Retrospective Video Analysis.
Overby, Megan S; Caspari, Susan S; Schreiber, James.
Afiliação
  • Overby MS; Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Caspari SS; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Schreiber J; School of Nursing, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 62(6): 1657-1675, 2019 06 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31181171
Purpose Studies of infants' early vocalizations have proven helpful in describing the developmental characteristics of various communication disorders. However, few studies have addressed the early vocalizations of infants and toddlers who were later diagnosed, as older children, with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). We refer to these infants and toddlers as LCAS. Extant studies also often lack a comparison group of infants and toddlers who were later diagnosed, as older children, with a speech sound disorder (SSD). We refer to these infants and toddlers as LSSD. We aimed to compare the volubility, consonant emergence, and syllabic structure from birth to age of 2 years, as observed in home videos, among 3 groups of infants and toddlers: LCAS, LSSD, and typically developing (TD). Method We assessed the speech-language skills of 17 children (3.5-8.8 years old; 7 with CAS, 5 with SSD, and 5 TD) and transcribed home videos (obtained from parents) of these same children from birth to age of 2 years. Early vocalizations were coded as nonresonant or resonant. Nonresonant vocalizations could not be transcribed with the International Phonetic Alphabet. Resonant (speechlike) vocalizations were broadly transcribed, and resonant consonants were categorized by place, manner, and voicing. Results Effect size comparisons revealed LCAS infants and toddlers were less voluble, used fewer resonant consonants, had a less diverse phonetic repertoire, and acquired resonant consonants later than either the LSSD or TD participants. For LSSD infants and toddlers, means for these dependent variables were lower than the means demonstrated by the TD group, but effect size were not strong due to LSSD variability. Conclusions Findings imply there might be clinical "red flags" that could assist the identification of infants and toddlers at risk for later diagnosis of CAS. Data did not support red flags for identifying infants and toddlers at risk for later diagnosis of SSD. Because of significant study limitations, results obtained should be considered preliminary. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8233334.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apraxias / Fonética / Linguagem Infantil / Transtorno Fonológico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Speech Lang Hear Res Assunto da revista: AUDIOLOGIA / PATOLOGIA DA FALA E LINGUAGEM Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apraxias / Fonética / Linguagem Infantil / Transtorno Fonológico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Speech Lang Hear Res Assunto da revista: AUDIOLOGIA / PATOLOGIA DA FALA E LINGUAGEM Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos