Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interlaboratory reproducibility of a test method following 4-field test methodology to evaluate the susceptibility of Clostridium difficile spores.
Gemein, S; Gebel, J; Christiansen, B; Martiny, H; Vossebein, L; Brill, F H H; Decius, M; Eggers, M; Koburger-Janssen, T; Meckel, M; Werner, S; Hunsinger, B; Selhorst, T; Kampf, G; Exner, M.
Afiliação
  • Gemein S; Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; VAH Ring Trial Steering Gremium of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: stefanie.gemein@ukbonn.de.
  • Gebel J; Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; VAH Ring Trial Steering Gremium of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany; Disinfectant Commission 4+4-Group of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany.
  • Christiansen B; Disinfectant Commission 4+4-Group of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany; ZE Medizinaluntersuchungsamt und Hygiene, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Martiny H; VAH Ring Trial Steering Gremium of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany; Disinfectant Commission 4+4-Group of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany.
  • Vossebein L; Disinfectant Commission 4+4-Group of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany; University of Applied Sciences Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
  • Brill FHH; Dr Brill + Partner GmbH, Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Decius M; ZE Medizinaluntersuchungsamt und Hygiene, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Eggers M; Labor Prof. Gisela Enders MVZ GbR, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Koburger-Janssen T; Hygiene Nord GmbH, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Meckel M; IKI Institut für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionskontrolle GmbH, Gießen, Germany.
  • Werner S; HygCen Germany GmbH, Schwerin, Germany.
  • Hunsinger B; VAH Ring Trial Steering Gremium of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany.
  • Selhorst T; Institut für Tierwissenschaften, Präventives Gesundheitsmanagement, University Bonn, Germany.
  • Kampf G; Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Exner M; Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Hosp Infect ; 103(1): 78-84, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31199936
BACKGROUND: Sporicidal surface disinfection is recommended to control transmission of Clostridium difficile in healthcare facilities. EN 17126 provides a method to determine the sporicidal activity in suspension and has been approved as a European standard. In addition, a sporicidal surface test has been proposed. AIM: To determine the interlaboratory reproducibility of a test method for evaluating the susceptibility of a C. difficile spore preparation to a biocidal formulation following the 4-field test (EN 16615 methodology). METHODS: Nine laboratories participated. C. difficile NCTC 13366 spores were used. Glutaraldehyde (1% and 6%; 15 min) and peracetic acid (PAA; 0.01% and 0.04%; 15 min) were used to determine the spores' susceptibility in suspension in triplicate. FINDINGS: One-percent glutaraldehyde revealed a mean decimal log10 reduction of 1.03 with variable results in the nine laboratories (0.37-1.49) and a reproducibility of 0.38. The effect of 6% glutaraldehyde was stronger (mean: 2.05; range: 0.96-4.29; reproducibility: 0.86). PAA revealed similar results. An exemplary biocidal formulation based on 5% PAA was used at 0.5% (non-effective concentration) and 4% (effective concentration) to determine the sporicidal efficacy (4-field test) under clean conditions in triplicate with a contact time of 15 min. When used at 0.5% it demonstrated an overall log10 reduction of 2.68 (range: 2.35-3.57) and at 4% of 4.61 (range: 3.82-5.71). The residual contamination on the three primarily uncontaminated test fields was <50 cfu/25 cm2 in one out of nine laboratories (0.5%) and in seven out of nine laboratories (4%). CONCLUSION: The interlaboratory reproducibility seems to be robust.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esporos Bacterianos / Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana / Clostridioides difficile / Desinfetantes Idioma: En Revista: J Hosp Infect Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esporos Bacterianos / Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana / Clostridioides difficile / Desinfetantes Idioma: En Revista: J Hosp Infect Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido