Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Chinese T2DM Patients: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial (AWARD-CHN2).
Li, Yan; Li, Ling; De Peng, Yong; Song, Guang Yao; Ye, Shan Dong; Du, Li Ying; Hou, Jia Ning; Ji, Qiu He.
Afiliação
  • Li Y; Department of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li L; Department of Endocrinology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • De Peng Y; Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Song GY; Department of Endocrinology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Ye SD; Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  • Du LY; Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China.
  • Hou JN; Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China. hou_jia_ning@lilly.com.
  • Ji QH; Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shanxi, China. jqiuhe@fmmu.edu.cn.
Diabetes Ther ; 10(4): 1435-1452, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228090
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To evaluate efficacy and safety data of dulaglutide in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had inadequate glycemic control with 1-2 oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs).

METHODS:

This is a subgroup analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomized, parallel-arm, 52-week study in Chinese patients aged ≥ 18 years with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control with OAMs (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 11.0%). The primary endpoint was assessment of the noninferiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg as measured by change in HbA1c, compared with insulin glargine (glargine), using a 0.4% noninferiority margin at week 26.

RESULTS:

A total of 607 patients from China were randomized 111 to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 or 0.75 mg or once-daily glargine. At week 26, the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in HbA1c was greater with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (- 1.67%) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (- 1.31%) compared with glargine (- 1.11%). The LSM (95% confidence interval) for the difference of dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg vs glargine was - 0.56% (- 0.75 to - 0.37) and - 0.20% (- 0.39 to - 0.01), respectively. Both doses of dulaglutide were noninferior and superior to glargine at 26 weeks and 52 weeks (two-sided P value < 0.05). The mean body weight decreased (P < 0.001) and total hypoglycemia rates were lower (P < 0.05) in the dulaglutide groups compared with the glargine group. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were the most frequently reported AEs in dulaglutide groups.

CONCLUSION:

Both doses of dulaglutide are efficacious and tolerable in Chinese patients with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control on OAMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01648582.

FUNDING:

Eli Lilly and Company.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China